Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMKIX vs RNWBX
AMKIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AMKIX vs RNWBX
American Century Emerging Markets I
Price$16.94
Change+$2.07 (+13.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
AMKIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMKIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMKIX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. AMKIX (1.86B). AMKIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AMKIX (1.19) vs RNWBX (0.45). AMKIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AMKIX (27 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than AMKIX (1.07). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. AMKIX (29.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMKIX: RNWBX (250) vs AMKIX (5000000). AMKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.46 vs. RNWBX (26.27). AMKIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.66 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| AMKIX | RNWBX | AMKIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.66 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.66 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.155 | 5.996 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.45 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.46 | 26.27 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.74 | 38.81 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.66 | 7.03 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.09 | 114.19 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement