Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMKIX vs RNWBX
AMKIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AMKIX vs RNWBX
American Century Emerging Markets I
Price$15.14
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.73B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
AMKIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMKIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMKIX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. AMKIX (1.73B). AMKIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AMKIX (0.68) vs RNWBX (0.12). AMKIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AMKIX (27 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than AMKIX (1.07). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AMKIX (29.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMKIX: RNWBX (250) vs AMKIX (5000000). AMKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.63 vs. RNWBX (18.68). AMKIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.08 vs. RNWBX (7.66).
| AMKIX | RNWBX | AMKIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.924 | 20.612 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 75.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.12 | 574% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.63 | 18.68 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.18 | 40.84 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.08 | 7.66 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.41 | 83.29 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement