AMKBY
Price
$9.93
Change
-$0.07 (-0.70%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
29.84B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
CICOF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.13 (-7.51%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
29.64B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMKBY vs CICOF

Header iconAMKBY vs CICOF Comparison
Open Charts AMKBY vs CICOFBanner chart's image
A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S
Price$9.93
Change-$0.07 (-0.70%)
Volume$72.7K
Capitalization29.84B
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
Price$1.60
Change-$0.13 (-7.51%)
Volume$59.13K
Capitalization29.64B
AMKBY vs CICOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMKBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMKBY vs. CICOF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMKBY is a Hold and CICOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (AMKBY: $9.93 vs. CICOF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: AMKBY and CICOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMKBY: 59% vs. CICOF: 733%
Market capitalization -- AMKBY: $29.84B vs. CICOF: $29.64B
AMKBY [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $29.84B. CICOF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $29.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMKBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCICOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMKBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CICOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMKBY and CICOF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMKBY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CICOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMKBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CICOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CICOF is a better buy in the short-term than AMKBY.

Price Growth

AMKBY (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -2.74% price change this week, while CICOF (@Marine Shipping) price change was -7.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMKBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.74% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMKBY($29.8B) and CICOF($29.6B) have the same market capitalization . AMKBY has higher P/E ratio than CICOF: AMKBY (4.54) vs CICOF (3.62). AMKBY YTD gains are higher at: 32.451 vs. CICOF (-2.439).
AMKBYCICOFAMKBY / CICOF
Capitalization29.8B29.6B101%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.451-2.439-1,330%
P/E Ratio4.543.62125%
Revenue56.8BN/A-
Total Cash6.95BN/A-
Total Debt17.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMKBY vs CICOF: Fundamental Ratings
AMKBY
CICOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6726
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4048
SMR RATING
1..100
2520
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8978
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a23

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CICOF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKBY (8). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to AMKBY’s over the last 12 months.

AMKBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (48). This means that AMKBY’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKBY (25). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to AMKBY’s over the last 12 months.

AMKBY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (63). This means that AMKBY’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKBY (89). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to AMKBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMKBYCICOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMKBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WVVI3.660.20
+5.78%
Willamette Valley Vineyards
FIS65.781.54
+2.40%
Fidelity National Information Services
SGHT3.48N/A
N/A
Sight Sciences
AMAL27.26-0.43
-1.55%
Amalgamated Financial Corp
HRI113.68-5.19
-4.37%
Herc Holdings

AMKBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMKBY has been loosely correlated with AMKBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMKBY jumps, then AMKBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMKBY
1D Price
Change %
AMKBY100%
-0.70%
AMKBF - AMKBY
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMKAF - AMKBY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
MSLOY - AMKBY
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
NPNYY - AMKBY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
MPZZF - AMKBY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More

CICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICOF and AMKAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICOF and AMKAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICOF
1D Price
Change %
CICOF100%
N/A
AMKAF - CICOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
MPZZF - CICOF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
AMKBY - CICOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
BWLP - CICOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
CICOY - CICOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
More