AMKAF
Price
$2071.12
Change
+$7.45 (+0.36%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
29.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CICOF
Price
$1.70
Change
-$0.05 (-2.86%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Capitalization
32.81B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMKAF vs CICOF

Header iconAMKAF vs CICOF Comparison
Open Charts AMKAF vs CICOFBanner chart's image
A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S
Price$2071.12
Change+$7.45 (+0.36%)
Volume$1
Capitalization29.09B
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
Price$1.70
Change-$0.05 (-2.86%)
Volume$300
Capitalization32.81B
AMKAF vs CICOF Comparison Chart in %
AMKAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CICOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMKAF vs. CICOF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMKAF is a StrongBuy and CICOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AMKAF: $2071.12 vs. CICOF: $1.70)
Brand notoriety: AMKAF and CICOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMKAF: 15% vs. CICOF: 3%
Market capitalization -- AMKAF: $29.09B vs. CICOF: $32.81B
AMKAF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $29.09B. CICOF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $32.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMKAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCICOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMKAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CICOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMKAF is a better buy in the long-term than CICOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMKAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CICOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMKAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CICOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMKAF is a better buy in the short-term than CICOF.

Price Growth

AMKAF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while CICOF (@Marine Shipping) price change was -2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.89% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICOF($32.8B) has a higher market cap than AMKAF($29.1B). AMKAF has higher P/E ratio than CICOF: AMKAF (5.92) vs CICOF (3.84). AMKAF YTD gains are higher at: 35.567 vs. CICOF (3.659). CICOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9B vs. AMKAF (13.9B). CICOF has higher revenues than AMKAF: CICOF (176B) vs AMKAF (56.8B).
AMKAFCICOFAMKAF / CICOF
Capitalization29.1B32.8B89%
EBITDA13.9B35.9B39%
Gain YTD35.5673.659972%
P/E Ratio5.923.84154%
Revenue56.8B176B32%
Total Cash6.95BN/A-
Total Debt17.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMKAF vs CICOF: Fundamental Ratings
AMKAF
CICOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2894
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7846
SMR RATING
1..100
2564
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4761
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CICOF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKAF (8). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to AMKAF’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKAF (78). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to AMKAF’s over the last 12 months.

AMKAF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CICOF (64). This means that AMKAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

AMKAF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (57). This means that AMKAF’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

AMKAF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (61). This means that AMKAF’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMKAFCICOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMKAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CICOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEYS33.570.56
+1.70%
Weyco Group
MBIN32.470.54
+1.69%
Merchants Bancorp
TCBS15.970.04
+0.25%
Texas Community Bancshares
EICC25.14-0.09
-0.36%
Eagle Point Income Company
PATH14.25-0.12
-0.84%
UiPath

AMKAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMKAF has been loosely correlated with AMKBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMKAF jumps, then AMKBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMKAF
1D Price
Change %
AMKAF100%
N/A
AMKBY - AMKAF
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
AMKBF - AMKAF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZIM - AMKAF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
MSLOY - AMKAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
NPNYY - AMKAF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More

CICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICOF and MPZZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICOF and MPZZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICOF
1D Price
Change %
CICOF100%
N/A
MPZZF - CICOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMKAF - CICOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSX - CICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
KNOP - CICOF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
CICOY - CICOF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
More