AMIGF
Price
$45.42
Change
+$0.56 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.3B
HCXLF
Price
$17.00
Change
-$1.00 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.81B
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMIGF vs HCXLF

Header iconAMIGF vs HCXLF Comparison
Open Charts AMIGF vs HCXLFBanner chart's image
Admiral Group
Price$45.42
Change+$0.56 (+1.25%)
Volume$221
Capitalization8.3B
Hiscox
Price$17.00
Change-$1.00 (-5.56%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization4.81B
AMIGF vs HCXLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMIGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMIGF vs. HCXLF commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMIGF is a Buy and HCXLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (AMIGF: $47.35 vs. HCXLF: $17.00)
Brand notoriety: AMIGF and HCXLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMIGF: 68% vs. HCXLF: 30%
Market capitalization -- AMIGF: $8.3B vs. HCXLF: $4.81B
AMIGF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $8.3B. HCXLF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $4.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMIGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCXLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMIGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCXLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCXLF is a better buy in the long-term than AMIGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMIGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCXLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMIGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HCXLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCXLF is a better buy in the short-term than AMIGF.

Price Growth

AMIGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +4.25% price change this week, while HCXLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCXLF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.28% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMIGF($8.3B) has a higher market cap than HCXLF($4.81B). HCXLF has higher P/E ratio than AMIGF: HCXLF (114.94) vs AMIGF (17.61). AMIGF YTD gains are higher at: 49.913 vs. HCXLF (23.937). HCXLF has less debt than AMIGF: HCXLF (716M) vs AMIGF (1.03B). HCXLF has higher revenues than AMIGF: HCXLF (3.05B) vs AMIGF (1.49B).
AMIGFHCXLFAMIGF / HCXLF
Capitalization8.3B4.81B172%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD49.91323.937209%
P/E Ratio17.61114.9415%
Revenue1.49B3.05B49%
Total Cash2.67BN/A-
Total Debt1.03B716M144%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMIGF vs HCXLF: Fundamental Ratings
AMIGF
HCXLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5517
SMR RATING
1..100
3478
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCXLF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (94). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (55). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.

AMIGF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCXLF (78). This means that AMIGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCXLF’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (89). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (85). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMIGFHCXLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMIGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWJ72.610.80
+1.11%
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
NVD10.650.11
+1.04%
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
GFLW26.310.03
+0.10%
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
ENOR27.34-0.18
-0.65%
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
THQ16.93-0.71
-4.02%
abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund

AMIGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMIGF and HRTG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMIGF and HRTG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMIGF
1D Price
Change %
AMIGF100%
+4.25%
HRTG - AMIGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
UVE - AMIGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
SSREY - AMIGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
HCI - AMIGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
HVRRY - AMIGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
More

HCXLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCXLF and HVRRY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCXLF and HVRRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCXLF
1D Price
Change %
HCXLF100%
N/A
HVRRY - HCXLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
PLMR - HCXLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
GJNSF - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HVRRF - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
AMIGF - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+4.25%
More