Advertisement
AMIGF vs HCXLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMIGF is a Hold and HCXLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMIGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCXLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMIGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HCXLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMIGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCXLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMIGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
- HCXLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AMIGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCXLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
HCXLF is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.75% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| AMIGF | HCXLF | AMIGF / HCXLF | |
| Capitalization | 12.8B | 6.27B | 204% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.917 | 29.297 | 106% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.24 | 10.31 | 109% |
| Revenue | 5.23B | 3.84B | 136% |
| Total Cash | 3.73B | 1.31B | 284% |
| Total Debt | 1.58B | 875M | 181% |
AMIGF | HCXLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCXLF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (80). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.
HCXLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (88). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.
AMIGF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCXLF (69). This means that AMIGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCXLF’s over the last 12 months.
HCXLF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as AMIGF (57). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew similarly to AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.
HCXLF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMIGF (91). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.
| AMIGF | HCXLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 25% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% | 3 days ago 23% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 25% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 28% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% | 3 days ago 18% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NCV | 15.49 | 0.10 | +0.65% |
| Virtus Convertible & Income Fund | |||
| MDYG | 94.63 | 0.16 | +0.17% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF | |||
| MBSD | 20.79 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS ETF | |||
| BTFX | 33.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Valkyrie ETF Trust II Valkyrie Bitcoin Futures Leveraged Strategy ETF | |||
| BULU | 6.68 | -0.02 | -0.23% |
| T-REX 2X Long BULL Daily Target ETF | |||
AMIGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMIGF and HCI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMIGF and HCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMIGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMIGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HCI - AMIGF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| UVE - AMIGF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| HRTG - AMIGF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| AMIGY - AMIGF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| HCXLF - AMIGF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HCXLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HCXLF and AMIGF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCXLF and AMIGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCXLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCXLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AMIGF - HCXLF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMIGY - HCXLF | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| GJNSF - HCXLF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LMND - HCXLF | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| PLMR - HCXLF | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
More | ||||