It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMIGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMIGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMIGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -4.56% price change this week, while HCI (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -6.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.91%.
HCI is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| AMIGF | HCI | AMIGF / HCI | |
| Capitalization | 12.6B | 2.38B | 529% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.880 | 63.927 | 59% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.19 | 11.65 | 105% |
| Revenue | 5.23B | 776M | 674% |
| Total Cash | 3.73B | 1.31B | 286% |
| Total Debt | 1.58B | 16.7M | 9,467% |
AMIGF | HCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCI's Valuation (86) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMIGF (87) in the null industry. This means that HCI’s stock grew similarly to AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.
HCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (78) in the null industry. This means that HCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.
AMIGF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as HCI (42) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AMIGF’s stock grew similarly to HCI’s over the last 12 months.
HCI's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMIGF (56) in the null industry. This means that HCI’s stock grew similarly to AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.
HCI's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMIGF (86) in the null industry. This means that HCI’s stock grew significantly faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.
| AMIGF | HCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 7 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 21 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 88% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMIGF and HCI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMIGF and HCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMIGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMIGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HCI - AMIGF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| UVE - AMIGF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| HRTG - AMIGF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| AMIGY - AMIGF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| HCXLF - AMIGF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCI has been loosely correlated with DGICA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCI jumps, then DGICA could also see price increases.