AMIGF
Price
$45.63
Change
+$1.95 (+4.46%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
13.08B
GJNSF
Price
$17.52
Change
+$2.12 (+13.77%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMIGF vs GJNSF

Header iconAMIGF vs GJNSF Comparison
Open Charts AMIGF vs GJNSFBanner chart's image
Admiral Group
Price$45.63
Change+$1.95 (+4.46%)
Volume$326
Capitalization13.08B
Gjensidige Forsikring Asa
Price$17.52
Change+$2.12 (+13.77%)
Volume$800
Capitalization13.88B
AMIGF vs GJNSF Comparison Chart in %
AMIGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMIGF vs. GJNSF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMIGF is a Hold and GJNSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AMIGF: $45.63 vs. GJNSF: $17.52)
Brand notoriety: AMIGF and GJNSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMIGF: 99% vs. GJNSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AMIGF: $13.08B vs. GJNSF: $13.88B
AMIGF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $13.08B. GJNSF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $13.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $132.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMIGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGJNSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMIGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GJNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMIGF is a better buy in the long-term than GJNSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMIGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AMIGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AMIGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GJNSF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.11% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GJNSF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than AMIGF($13.1B). GJNSF has higher P/E ratio than AMIGF: GJNSF (19.31) vs AMIGF (12.51). AMIGF YTD gains are higher at: 44.467 vs. GJNSF (0.000). GJNSF has more cash in the bank: 4.1B vs. AMIGF (3.73B). AMIGF has less debt than GJNSF: AMIGF (1.58B) vs GJNSF (5.35B). GJNSF has higher revenues than AMIGF: GJNSF (43.5B) vs AMIGF (5.23B).
AMIGFGJNSFAMIGF / GJNSF
Capitalization13.1B13.9B94%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.4670.000-
P/E Ratio12.5119.3165%
Revenue5.23B43.5B12%
Total Cash3.73B4.1B91%
Total Debt1.58B5.35B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMIGF vs GJNSF: Fundamental Ratings
AMIGF
GJNSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3348
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
1792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8853
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GJNSF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (89). This means that GJNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.

AMIGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSF (100). This means that AMIGF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSF’s over the last 12 months.

AMIGF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GJNSF (92). This means that AMIGF’s stock grew significantly faster than GJNSF’s over the last 12 months.

AMIGF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSF (55). This means that AMIGF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSF’s over the last 12 months.

GJNSF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMIGF (88). This means that GJNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMIGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMIGFGJNSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMIGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WANT49.271.20
+2.50%
Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bull 3X ETF
NAZ11.950.03
+0.25%
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund
IBMP25.41N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bd ETF
LIAP216.54N/A
N/A
Stone Ridge 2057 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF
VUSB49.94-0.01
-0.01%
Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF

AMIGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMIGF and HCI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMIGF and HCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMIGF
1D Price
Change %
AMIGF100%
N/A
HCI - AMIGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
UVE - AMIGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
HRTG - AMIGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
AMIGY - AMIGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
HCXLF - AMIGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GJNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GJNSF and GJNSY have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GJNSF and GJNSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GJNSF
1D Price
Change %
GJNSF100%
N/A
GJNSY - GJNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMND - GJNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
AMIGY - GJNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
HCXLF - GJNSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMIGF - GJNSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More