Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMIDX vs RNWHX
AMIDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AMIDX vs RNWHX
Amana Developing World Institutional
Price$15.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.84M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.26
Change+$0.16 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
AMIDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMIDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMIDX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. AMIDX (154M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AMIDX: RNWHX (0.91) vs AMIDX (0.68). AMIDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AMIDX (12 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AMIDX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AMIDX (9.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMIDX: RNWHX (250) vs AMIDX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.02 vs. AMIDX (14.05). AMIDX return over 5 years is better than : 30.49 vs. RNWHX (18.77).
| AMIDX | RNWHX | AMIDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.72 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.72 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.042 | 25.862 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.91 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.05 | 20.02 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.35 | 43.48 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.49 | 18.77 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.01 | 93.48 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement