Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMHIX vs PATFX
AMHIX vs PATFX Comparison
Open Charts AMHIX vs PATFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$15.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.21B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield Adv
Price$11.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.35B
AMHIX vs PATFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMHIX vs. PATFX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMHIX is a Hold and PATFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. PATFX (3.35B). AMHIX pays higher dividends than PATFX: AMHIX (3.96) vs PATFX (3.68). AMHIX was incepted earlier than PATFX: AMHIX (31 years) vs PATFX (13 years). PATFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than AMHIX (0.66). AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. PATFX (14.20). AMHIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PATFX: AMHIX (250) vs PATFX (2500). PATFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.53 vs. AMHIX (0.80). PATFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.53 vs. AMHIX (-6.53).
| AMHIX | PATFX | AMHIX / PATFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.97 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.97 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.131 | 2.786 | 5% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 3.35B | 394% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.96 | 3.68 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 3.53 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.72 | 15.82 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.53 | 5.53 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.82 | 20.67 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement