It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINVH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INVH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +1.05% price change this week, while INVH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.42%.
AMH is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
INVH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
AMH | INVH | AMH / INVH | |
Capitalization | 12.9B | 18.7B | 69% |
EBITDA | 1.16B | 1.64B | 71% |
Gain YTD | -5.469 | -2.805 | 195% |
P/E Ratio | 31.33 | 34.31 | 91% |
Revenue | 1.8B | 2.68B | 67% |
Total Cash | 323M | 65.1M | 496% |
Total Debt | 5.18B | 8.18B | 63% |
AMH | INVH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMH's Valuation (85) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as INVH (92). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as INVH (66). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's SMR Rating (83) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as INVH (83). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
INVH's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (75). This means that INVH’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as INVH (81). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH | INVH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago53% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago41% | 3 days ago53% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago51% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago53% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago48% | 3 days ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago58% | 5 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago52% | 7 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago37% | 3 days ago45% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PMMR | 25.58 | N/A | N/A |
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - March | |||
DTCR | 18.73 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
Global X Data Center & Dgtl Infrs ETF | |||
STNC | 32.32 | -0.04 | -0.12% |
Hennessy Sustainable ETF | |||
OILT | 22.66 | -0.10 | -0.43% |
Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | |||
ESML | 43.09 | -0.19 | -0.44% |
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INVH has been closely correlated with AMH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INVH jumps, then AMH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INVH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INVH | 100% | +0.96% | ||
AMH - INVH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
EQR - INVH | 76% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
UDR - INVH | 76% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
ESS - INVH | 73% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
CPT - INVH | 73% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More |