AMH
Price
$31.69
Change
-$0.66 (-2.04%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.76B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ESS
Price
$253.61
Change
-$1.36 (-0.53%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
16.33B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMH vs ESS

Header iconAMH vs ESS Comparison
Open Charts AMH vs ESSBanner chart's image
American Homes 4 Rent
Price$31.69
Change-$0.66 (-2.04%)
Volume$2.34M
Capitalization11.76B
Essex Property Trust
Price$253.61
Change-$1.36 (-0.53%)
Volume$524.41K
Capitalization16.33B
AMH vs ESS Comparison Chart in %
AMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ESS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMH vs. ESS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMH is a StrongBuy and ESS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AMH: $31.69 vs. ESS: $253.61)
Brand notoriety: AMH and ESS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMH: 79% vs. ESS: 110%
Market capitalization -- AMH: $11.76B vs. ESS: $16.33B
AMH [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $11.76B. ESS’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $16.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $25.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESS is a better buy in the long-term than AMH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ESS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESS is a better buy in the short-term than AMH.

Price Growth

AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while ESS (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMH is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

ESS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (+0.81% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESS($16.3B) has a higher market cap than AMH($11.8B). AMH has higher P/E ratio than ESS: AMH (26.86) vs ESS (19.29). ESS YTD gains are higher at: -7.913 vs. AMH (-13.104). ESS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. AMH (1.16B). AMH has less debt than ESS: AMH (5.18B) vs ESS (6.81B). ESS (1.84B) and AMH (1.8B) have equivalent revenues.
AMHESSAMH / ESS
Capitalization11.8B16.3B72%
EBITDA1.16B1.72B67%
Gain YTD-13.104-7.913166%
P/E Ratio26.8619.29139%
Revenue1.8B1.84B98%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.18B6.81B76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMH vs ESS: Fundamental Ratings
AMH
ESS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6860
SMR RATING
1..100
8255
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8191
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ESS's Valuation (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (88). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.

ESS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (68). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.

ESS's SMR Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (82). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.

ESS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (74). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.

AMH's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ESS (91). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to ESS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMHESS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ESS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBTF23.31N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Tr ETF
CPRA26.15N/A
N/A
Calamos Russell 2000 Str Alt Prt ETF-Apr
WTIU10.56-0.03
-0.33%
MicroSectors™ Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
PEJ57.84-0.85
-1.45%
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF
QIS18.75-0.52
-2.72%
Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF

AMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMH
1D Price
Change %
AMH100%
-2.04%
INVH - AMH
88%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
UDR - AMH
80%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
EQR - AMH
77%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
CPT - AMH
76%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
ESS - AMH
76%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
More

ESS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESS has been closely correlated with EQR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESS jumps, then EQR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESS
1D Price
Change %
ESS100%
-0.53%
EQR - ESS
91%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
AVB - ESS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
UDR - ESS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
MAA - ESS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
CPT - ESS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
More