It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -2.71% price change this week, while ESS (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -0.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.21%.
AMH is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
ESS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
AMH | ESS | AMH / ESS | |
Capitalization | 12.9B | 17.3B | 75% |
EBITDA | 1.16B | 1.72B | 67% |
Gain YTD | -5.279 | -3.584 | 147% |
P/E Ratio | 31.40 | 21.55 | 146% |
Revenue | 1.8B | 1.84B | 98% |
Total Cash | 323M | 141M | 229% |
Total Debt | 5.18B | 6.81B | 76% |
AMH | ESS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESS's Valuation (82) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (86). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ESS (62). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to ESS’s over the last 12 months.
ESS's SMR Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (84). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
ESS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (61). This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ESS (92). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to ESS’s over the last 12 months.
AMH | ESS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago44% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% | 4 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% | 4 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago49% | 4 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago49% | 4 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago58% | 4 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago53% | 14 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago38% | 4 days ago29% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GOEX | 58.90 | 1.67 | +2.92% |
Global X Gold Explorers ETF | |||
BUCK | 23.86 | 0.09 | +0.38% |
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | |||
UTRE | 49.94 | 0.09 | +0.18% |
F/m US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF | |||
IBTF | 23.31 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Tr ETF | |||
SIXD | 28.08 | N/A | -0.01% |
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Jun/Dec ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESS has been closely correlated with AVB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESS jumps, then AVB could also see price increases.