It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEQR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while EQR (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.52%.
AMH is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
EQR is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| AMH | EQR | AMH / EQR | |
| Capitalization | 11.8B | 22.6B | 52% |
| EBITDA | 1.16B | 2.38B | 49% |
| Gain YTD | -13.104 | -14.023 | 93% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.86 | 19.52 | 138% |
| Revenue | 1.8B | 3.05B | 59% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.18B | 8.68B | 60% |
AMH | EQR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMH's Valuation (88) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EQR (95). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to EQR’s over the last 12 months.
EQR's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (68). This means that EQR’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
EQR's SMR Rating (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (82). This means that EQR’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
EQR's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (74). This means that EQR’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EQR (87). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to EQR’s over the last 12 months.
| AMH | EQR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 10 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSLS | 5.79 | 0.37 | +6.83% |
| Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | |||
| ICLO | 25.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF | |||
| QSML | 28.28 | N/A | N/A |
| WisdomTree U.S. Small Cap Quality Gr | |||
| SLQD | 50.67 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| iShares 0-5 Year Invmt Grade Corp Bd ETF | |||
| KNOV | 27.60 | -0.47 | -1.67% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Nov | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQR has been closely correlated with AVB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQR jumps, then AVB could also see price increases.