AMGDF
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.02 (+2.38%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
844.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BCCMY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
2.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMGDF vs BCCMY

Header iconAMGDF vs BCCMY Comparison
Open Charts AMGDF vs BCCMYBanner chart's image
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings
Price$0.86
Change+$0.02 (+2.38%)
Volume$11.65K
Capitalization844.11M
BAIC MTR
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$875
Capitalization2.2B
AMGDF vs BCCMY Comparison Chart in %
AMGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BCCMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMGDF vs. BCCMY commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGDF is a Buy and BCCMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AMGDF: $0.86 vs. BCCMY: $2.46)
Brand notoriety: AMGDF and BCCMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMGDF: 57% vs. BCCMY: 120%
Market capitalization -- AMGDF: $844.11M vs. BCCMY: $2.2B
AMGDF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $844.11M. BCCMY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.49T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBCCMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BCCMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCCMY is a better buy in the long-term than AMGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCCMY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BCCMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMGDF is a better buy in the short-term than BCCMY.

Price Growth

AMGDF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +5.22% price change this week, while BCCMY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+2.40% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCCMY($2.2B) has a higher market cap than AMGDF($844M). BCCMY YTD gains are higher at: -14.286 vs. AMGDF (-38.809). BCCMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. AMGDF (261M). BCCMY has higher revenues than AMGDF: BCCMY (198B) vs AMGDF (1.44B).
AMGDFBCCMYAMGDF / BCCMY
Capitalization844M2.2B38%
EBITDA261M30.3B1%
Gain YTD-38.809-14.286272%
P/E RatioN/A17.32-
Revenue1.44B198B1%
Total Cash124MN/A-
Total Debt1.46BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMGDF vs BCCMY: Fundamental Ratings
AMGDF
BCCMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3347
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9674
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8073
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
325
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCCMY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMGDF (59). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (100). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (96). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (80). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (32). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMGDFBCCMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BCCMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PASSX60.091.11
+1.88%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Adv
CYPIX77.891.21
+1.58%
ProFunds Consumer Disctnry Ultra Sec Inv
FAFCX35.720.53
+1.51%
Fidelity Advisor Financials C
RSIFX32.460.25
+0.78%
Victory RS Science and Technology A
DGYGX41.700.16
+0.39%
BNY Mellon Appreciation Y

AMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMGDF has been loosely correlated with ARGGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMGDF jumps, then ARGGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMGDF
1D Price
Change %
AMGDF100%
+2.95%
ARGGY - AMGDF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
STLA - AMGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.66%
BAMXF - AMGDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPEV - AMGDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
BMCLF - AMGDF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BCCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCCMY and AMGDF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCCMY and AMGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCCMY
1D Price
Change %
BCCMY100%
N/A
AMGDF - BCCMY
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
BMCLF - BCCMY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LI - BCCMY
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
BCAUF - BCCMY
1%
Poorly correlated
+13.80%
SBLX - BCCMY
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
More