AMGDF
Price
$1.13
Change
+$0.02 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.75B
BCAUF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.04 (-8.89%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMGDF vs BCAUF

Header iconAMGDF vs BCAUF Comparison
Open Charts AMGDF vs BCAUFBanner chart's image
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings
Price$1.13
Change+$0.02 (+1.82%)
Volume$323
Capitalization3.75B
Brilliance China Automotive Holding
Price$0.41
Change-$0.04 (-8.89%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.81B
AMGDF vs BCAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMGDF vs. BCAUF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGDF is a Hold and BCAUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (AMGDF: $1.13 vs. BCAUF: $0.41)
Brand notoriety: AMGDF and BCAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMGDF: 1% vs. BCAUF: 9%
Market capitalization -- AMGDF: $3.75B vs. BCAUF: $2.81B
AMGDF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $3.75B. BCAUF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $2.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBCAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCAUF is a better buy in the long-term than AMGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMGDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCAUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMGDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BCAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCAUF is a better buy in the short-term than AMGDF.

Price Growth

AMGDF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -5.46% price change this week, while BCAUF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +34.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.83% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMGDF($3.75B) has a higher market cap than BCAUF($2.81B). AMGDF has higher P/E ratio than BCAUF: AMGDF (6.28) vs BCAUF (3.50). BCAUF YTD gains are higher at: -11.957 vs. AMGDF (-20.213).
AMGDFBCAUFAMGDF / BCAUF
Capitalization3.75B2.81B133%
EBITDA163MN/A-
Gain YTD-20.213-11.957169%
P/E Ratio6.283.50179%
Revenue1.52BN/A-
Total Cash408MN/A-
Total Debt1.21BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMGDF vs BCAUF: Fundamental Ratings
AMGDF
BCAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9845
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4368
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMGDF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAUF (75). This means that AMGDF’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

AMGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAUF (100). This means that AMGDF’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAUF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMGDF (98). This means that BCAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAUF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (56). This means that BCAUF’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

AMGDF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAUF (68). This means that AMGDF’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMGDFBCAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTGS33.920.28
+0.83%
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
EMIF22.93N/A
N/A
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
AFMC31.96N/A
N/A
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
JHCR25.18N/A
N/A
JHancock Core Bond ETF
CMDY50.68-0.07
-0.14%
iShares Blmbrg Roll Sel Cmdty Strart ETF

AMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMGDF has been loosely correlated with ARGGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMGDF jumps, then ARGGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMGDF
1D Price
Change %
AMGDF100%
N/A
ARGGY - AMGDF
45%
Loosely correlated
+6.54%
BAMXF - AMGDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+7.28%
BCCMY - AMGDF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPEV - AMGDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
NIO - AMGDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
More

BCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCAUF and AYRO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCAUF and AYRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAUF
1D Price
Change %
BCAUF100%
-10.00%
AYRO - BCAUF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
AMGDF - BCAUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CENN - BCAUF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.84%
NIO - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
BCCMY - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More