AMG
Price
$299.19
Change
-$12.05 (-3.87%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.75B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$11.55
Change
-$0.51 (-4.23%)
Updated
Feb 5, 03:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.02B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMG vs OWL

Header iconAMG vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts AMG vs OWLBanner chart's image
Affiliated Managers Group
Price$299.19
Change-$12.05 (-3.87%)
Volume$600
Capitalization8.75B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$11.55
Change-$0.51 (-4.23%)
Volume$133.26K
Capitalization8.02B
AMG vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
AMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMG vs. OWL commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMG is a StrongBuy and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AMG: $311.24 vs. OWL: $12.06)
Brand notoriety: AMG and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMG: 82% vs. OWL: 334%
Market capitalization -- AMG: $8.75B vs. OWL: $8.02B
AMG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $8.75B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMG is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMG and OWL are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.75% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -16.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMG is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMG($8.76B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.02B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than AMG: OWL (150.75) vs AMG (18.63). AMG YTD gains are higher at: 7.964 vs. OWL (-19.277). AMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.19B vs. OWL (780M). AMG has more cash in the bank: 476M vs. OWL (137M). AMG has less debt than OWL: AMG (2.37B) vs OWL (3.78B). OWL has higher revenues than AMG: OWL (2.75B) vs AMG (2.04B).
AMGOWLAMG / OWL
Capitalization8.76B8.02B109%
EBITDA1.19B780M152%
Gain YTD7.964-19.277-41%
P/E Ratio18.63150.7512%
Revenue2.04B2.75B74%
Total Cash476M137M347%
Total Debt2.37B3.78B63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMG: Fundamental Ratings
AMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMGOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUT31.141.30
+4.34%
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
APMU25.300.02
+0.09%
ActivePassive Intermediate Mcpl Bd ETF
DFSI44.88-0.03
-0.07%
Dimensional International Sstby Cr 1 ETF
PLTY40.15-4.25
-9.57%
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
NVTX23.21-5.20
-18.30%
Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF

AMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMG has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMG jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMG
1D Price
Change %
AMG100%
+0.92%
CG - AMG
77%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
KKR - AMG
76%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
OWL - AMG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
JHG - AMG
75%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
BEN - AMG
74%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
-0.41%
KKR - OWL
88%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
BX - OWL
85%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
ARES - OWL
85%
Closely correlated
+4.27%
BN - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
BAM - OWL
80%
Closely correlated
+4.88%
More