AMFC
Price
$21.25
Change
-$1.30 (-5.76%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
18.47M
HRGG
Price
$14.50
Change
+$0.50 (+3.57%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMFC vs HRGG

Header iconAMFC vs HRGG Comparison
Open Charts AMFC vs HRGGBanner chart's image
AMB Financial
Price$21.25
Change-$1.30 (-5.76%)
Volume$2.27K
Capitalization18.47M
Heritage Nola Ban
Price$14.50
Change+$0.50 (+3.57%)
Volume$372
Capitalization25.47M
AMFC vs HRGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMFC vs. HRGG commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFC is a Hold and HRGG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMFC: $21.25 vs. HRGG: $14.50)
Brand notoriety: AMFC and HRGG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMFC: 250% vs. HRGG: 65%
Market capitalization -- AMFC: $18.47M vs. HRGG: $25.47M
AMFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $18.47M. HRGG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRGG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HRGG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMFC is a better buy in the long-term than HRGG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRGG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HRGG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMFC is a better buy in the short-term than HRGG.

Price Growth

AMFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HRGG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRGG($25.5M) has a higher market cap than AMFC($18.5M). AMFC YTD gains are higher at: 5.594 vs. HRGG (-3.333). HRGG has less debt than AMFC: HRGG (19.2M) vs AMFC (37.9M). HRGG (4.64M) and AMFC (4.57M) have equivalent revenues.
AMFCHRGGAMFC / HRGG
Capitalization18.5M25.5M73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.594-3.333-168%
P/E RatioN/A68.97-
Revenue4.57M4.64M98%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt37.9M19.2M197%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMFC vs HRGG: Fundamental Ratings
AMFC
HRGG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4769
SMR RATING
1..100
649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMFC's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HRGG (90). This means that AMFC’s stock grew significantly faster than HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

AMFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGG (69). This means that AMFC’s stock grew similarly to HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMFC (64). This means that HRGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMFC’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as AMFC (58). This means that HRGG’s stock grew similarly to AMFC’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMFC (69). This means that HRGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMFCHRGG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RZSMF1.11N/A
N/A
Rizzoli Corriere della Sera Mediagroup SPA AZ
HUNGF0.66N/A
N/A
Huaneng Power International, Inc.
IHAI0.07N/A
N/A
Innovative Holdings Alliance,Inc.
JFROF11.10N/A
N/A
J. Front Retailing Co., Ltd.
GLGI1.31-0.02
-1.80%
Greystone Logistics, Inc.

AMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMFC has been loosely correlated with BNMDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMFC jumps, then BNMDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMFC
1D Price
Change %
AMFC100%
N/A
BNMDF - AMFC
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HMST - AMFC
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
FSUN - AMFC
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
HRGG - AMFC
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
GNTY - AMFC
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
More

HRGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRGG has been loosely correlated with KGTFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRGG jumps, then KGTFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRGG
1D Price
Change %
HRGG100%
+3.57%
KGTFY - HRGG
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BPHLF - HRGG
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CFIC - HRGG
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIFF - HRGG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFDB - HRGG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More