AMFC
Price
$25.10
Change
+$0.10 (+0.40%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
22.31M
BNMDF
Price
$11.50
Change
+$1.05 (+10.05%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Capitalization
14.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMFC vs BNMDF

Header iconAMFC vs BNMDF Comparison
Open Charts AMFC vs BNMDFBanner chart's image
AMB Financial
Price$25.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.40%)
Volume$522
Capitalization22.31M
Banca Mediolanum SPA
Price$11.50
Change+$1.05 (+10.05%)
Volume$450
Capitalization14.63B
AMFC vs BNMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMFC vs. BNMDF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFC is a Buy and BNMDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AMFC: $25.10 vs. BNMDF: $11.50)
Brand notoriety: AMFC and BNMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMFC: 47% vs. BNMDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AMFC: $22.31M vs. BNMDF: $14.63B
AMFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.31M. BNMDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBNMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BNMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNMDF is a better buy in the long-term than AMFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AMFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AMFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while BNMDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNMDF($14.6B) has a higher market cap than AMFC($22.3M). BNMDF has higher P/E ratio than AMFC: BNMDF (8.96) vs AMFC (7.72). AMFC YTD gains are higher at: 25.085 vs. BNMDF (0.000). AMFC has less debt than BNMDF: AMFC (3.09M) vs BNMDF (393M).
AMFCBNMDFAMFC / BNMDF
Capitalization22.3M14.6B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.0850.000-
P/E Ratio7.728.9686%
RevenueN/A2.45B-
Total Cash2.57MN/A-
Total Debt3.09M393M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMFC vs BNMDF: Fundamental Ratings
AMFC
BNMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3349
SMR RATING
1..100
6912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6347
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMFC's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as BNMDF (39). This means that AMFC’s stock grew similarly to BNMDF’s over the last 12 months.

AMFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BNMDF (49). This means that AMFC’s stock grew similarly to BNMDF’s over the last 12 months.

BNMDF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMFC (69). This means that BNMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMFC’s over the last 12 months.

AMFC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BNMDF (57). This means that AMFC’s stock grew similarly to BNMDF’s over the last 12 months.

BNMDF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as AMFC (63). This means that BNMDF’s stock grew similarly to AMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMFCBNMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
30%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWN41.840.29
+0.70%
Northwest Natural Holding Company
CMRC4.470.02
+0.45%
Commerce.com Inc
LAD341.070.98
+0.29%
Lithia Motors
LOKVU10.50N/A
N/A
Live Oak Acquisition Corp. V
BRLS2.74-0.01
-0.37%
Borealis Foods

AMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMFC has been loosely correlated with BNMDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMFC jumps, then BNMDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMFC
1D Price
Change %
AMFC100%
+0.40%
BNMDF - AMFC
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HMST - AMFC
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUN - AMFC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
HRGG - AMFC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
GNTY - AMFC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

BNMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNMDF has been loosely correlated with AMFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNMDF jumps, then AMFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNMDF
1D Price
Change %
BNMDF100%
N/A
AMFC - BNMDF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
HMST - BNMDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVBT - BNMDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSY - BNMDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
BLX - BNMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More