AMFC
Price
$20.50
Change
+$0.50 (+2.50%)
Updated
Feb 19 closing price
Capitalization
18.47M
BNMDF
Price
$11.50
Change
+$1.05 (+10.05%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.2B
Ad is loading...

AMFC vs BNMDF

Header iconAMFC vs BNMDF Comparison
Open Charts AMFC vs BNMDFBanner chart's image
AMB Financial
Price$20.50
Change+$0.50 (+2.50%)
Volume$4.7K
Capitalization18.47M
Banca Mediolanum SPA
Price$11.50
Change+$1.05 (+10.05%)
Volume$450
Capitalization7.2B
AMFC vs BNMDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMFC vs. BNMDF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFC is a Hold and BNMDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AMFC: $20.50 vs. BNMDF: $11.50)
Brand notoriety: AMFC and BNMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMFC: 224% vs. BNMDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AMFC: $18.47M vs. BNMDF: $7.2B
AMFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $18.47M. BNMDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBNMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BNMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMFC is a better buy in the long-term than BNMDF.

Price Growth

AMFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.50% price change this week, while BNMDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNMDF($7.2B) has a higher market cap than AMFC($18.5M). AMFC YTD gains are higher at: 1.248 vs. BNMDF (0.000). AMFC has less debt than BNMDF: AMFC (37.9M) vs BNMDF (375M). BNMDF has higher revenues than AMFC: BNMDF (1.55B) vs AMFC (4.57M).
AMFCBNMDFAMFC / BNMDF
Capitalization18.5M7.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.2480.000-
P/E RatioN/A9.71-
Revenue4.57M1.55B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt37.9M375M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMFC vs BNMDF: Fundamental Ratings
AMFC
BNMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3645
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6364
SMR RATING
1..100
7311
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3347
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMFC's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNMDF (90). This means that AMFC’s stock grew significantly faster than BNMDF’s over the last 12 months.

AMFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BNMDF (64). This means that AMFC’s stock grew similarly to BNMDF’s over the last 12 months.

BNMDF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMFC (73). This means that BNMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMFC’s over the last 12 months.

AMFC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BNMDF (51). This means that AMFC’s stock grew similarly to BNMDF’s over the last 12 months.

AMFC's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BNMDF (47). This means that AMFC’s stock grew similarly to BNMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

AMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMFC has been loosely correlated with BNMDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMFC jumps, then BNMDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMFC
1D Price
Change %
AMFC100%
N/A
BNMDF - AMFC
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HMST - AMFC
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
FSUN - AMFC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
TBNK - AMFC
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
HRGG - AMFC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BNMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNMDF has been loosely correlated with AMFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNMDF jumps, then AMFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNMDF
1D Price
Change %
BNMDF100%
N/A
AMFC - BNMDF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HMST - BNMDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
SVBT - BNMDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSY - BNMDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
BLX - BNMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
More