AMED
Price
$97.94
Change
+$0.11 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
One day until earnings call
FMCQF
Price
$52.15
Change
-$1.45 (-2.71%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
13.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMED vs FMCQF

Header iconAMED vs FMCQF Comparison
Open Charts AMED vs FMCQFBanner chart's image
Amedisys
Price$97.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.11%)
Volume$417.52K
Capitalization3.02B
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$52.15
Change-$1.45 (-2.71%)
Volume$593
Capitalization13.88B
AMED vs FMCQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMED vs. FMCQF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMED is a Hold and FMCQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AMED: $97.94 vs. FMCQF: $52.15)
Brand notoriety: AMED and FMCQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMED: 113% vs. FMCQF: 24%
Market capitalization -- AMED: $3.02B vs. FMCQF: $13.88B
AMED [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $3.02B. FMCQF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $13.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMED’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMED’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMCQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCQF is a better buy in the long-term than AMED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCQF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMCQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMCQF is a better buy in the short-term than AMED.

Price Growth

AMED (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while FMCQF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMED is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.28% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCQF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than AMED($3.02B). AMED has higher P/E ratio than FMCQF: AMED (1170.50) vs FMCQF (22.03). FMCQF YTD gains are higher at: 14.918 vs. AMED (7.875). FMCQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.35B vs. AMED (129M). FMCQF has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. AMED (126M). AMED has less debt than FMCQF: AMED (487M) vs FMCQF (13.3B). FMCQF has higher revenues than AMED: FMCQF (19.6B) vs AMED (2.24B).
AMEDFMCQFAMED / FMCQF
Capitalization3.02B13.9B22%
EBITDA129M3.35B4%
Gain YTD7.87514.91853%
P/E Ratio1170.5022.035,314%
Revenue2.24B19.6B11%
Total Cash126M1.22B10%
Total Debt487M13.3B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMED vs FMCQF: Fundamental Ratings
AMED
FMCQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7784
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMCQF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMED (78) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMED’s over the last 12 months.

FMCQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMED (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to AMED’s over the last 12 months.

AMED's SMR Rating (77) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMCQF (84) in the null industry. This means that AMED’s stock grew similarly to FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCQF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as AMED (56) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to AMED’s over the last 12 months.

AMED's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMCQF (52) in the null industry. This means that AMED’s stock grew similarly to FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMEDFMCQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATEC10.820.11
+1.03%
Alphatec Holdings
FORL11.57N/A
N/A
Four Leaf Acquisition Corp
QETAU10.84N/A
N/A
Quetta Acquisition Corp
CHDN113.53-0.22
-0.19%
Churchill Downs
CCNE24.01-0.39
-1.60%
CNB Financial Corp

AMED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMED and FMCQF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMED and FMCQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMED
1D Price
Change %
AMED100%
+0.11%
FMCQF - AMED
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPCH - AMED
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
USPH - AMED
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
EHAB - AMED
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
BKD - AMED
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

FMCQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMCQF and FSNUY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMCQF and FSNUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCQF
1D Price
Change %
FMCQF100%
N/A
FSNUY - FMCQF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
AMED - FMCQF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
OPCH - FMCQF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
CCEL - FMCQF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.78%
FSNUF - FMCQF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More