AMED vs EHAB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMED is a Hold and EHAB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMED’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEHAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMED’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- EHAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EHAB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EHAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMED (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while EHAB (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +1.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMED is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.
EHAB is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.56% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AMED | EHAB | AMED / EHAB | |
| Capitalization | 3.02B | 566M | 533% |
| EBITDA | 129M | -16.5M | -782% |
| Gain YTD | 1.421 | 1.280 | 111% |
| P/E Ratio | 1170.50 | 10.75 | 10,886% |
| Revenue | 2.24B | 1.05B | 214% |
| Total Cash | 126M | 27.4M | 460% |
| Total Debt | 487M | 610M | 80% |
AMED | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMED | EHAB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 51% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 58% | 24 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 55% |
AMED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMED and FMCQF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMED and FMCQF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMED | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| FMCQF - AMED | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| OPCH - AMED | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| EHAB - AMED | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
| USPH - AMED | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| CYH - AMED | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||
EHAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EHAB and DCGO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHAB and DCGO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EHAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHAB | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| DCGO - EHAB | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
| BKD - EHAB | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.37% | ||
| AVAH - EHAB | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| CYH - EHAB | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| ADUS - EHAB | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
More | ||||