Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs RRMGX
AMCZX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs RRMGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$18.23
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets273.02M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.50
Change+$0.08 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.37B
AMCZX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. RRMGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a StrongBuy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. AMCZX (273M). AMCZX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . AMCZX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: AMCZX (10 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than AMCZX (0.98). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: RRMGX (2500) vs AMCZX (500000). AMCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.13 vs. RRMGX (-5.56). AMCZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.72 vs. RRMGX (-4.14).
| AMCZX | RRMGX | AMCZX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.29 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.29 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.223 | 1.797 | 791% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 2500 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 273M | 27.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.13 | -5.56 | -488% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | -1.26 | -3,498% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.72 | -4.14 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.15 | 13.18 | 479% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers