Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs RRMGX
AMCZX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs RRMGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$18.83
Change+$0.11 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.41M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.86
Change+$0.80 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.86B
AMCZX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. RRMGX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.9B vs. AMCZX (279M). AMCZX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . AMCZX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: AMCZX (10 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than AMCZX (0.98). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: RRMGX (2500) vs AMCZX (500000). AMCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.78 vs. RRMGX (-8.25). AMCZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.54 vs. RRMGX (-2.34).
| AMCZX | RRMGX | AMCZX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.29 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.29 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.982 | 2.207 | 815% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 2500 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 26.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.78 | -8.25 | -300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.31 | 17.94 | 431% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.54 | -2.34 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.73 | 25.68 | 369% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement