Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$19.43
Change-$0.19 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.27M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.74
Change+$0.17 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. AMCZX (291M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCZX: FSMAX (0.57) vs AMCZX (0.00). AMCZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCZX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMCZX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCZX (500000). AMCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. FSMAX (15.86). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. AMCZX (-12.13).
| AMCZX | FSMAX | AMCZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.848 | 4.867 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 40.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 15.86 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.56 | 60.22 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.13 | 25.65 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.18 | 156.70 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers