AMCCF
Price
$8.36
Change
-$0.29 (-3.35%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
19.25B
HXGCF
Price
$1.63
Change
-$0.07 (-4.12%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
331.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMCCF vs HXGCF

Header iconAMCCF vs HXGCF Comparison
Open Charts AMCCF vs HXGCFBanner chart's image
Amcor
Price$8.36
Change-$0.29 (-3.35%)
Volume$1.62K
Capitalization19.25B
Hexagon Composites ASA
Price$1.63
Change-$0.07 (-4.12%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization331.32M
AMCCF vs HXGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMCCF vs. HXGCF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCCF is a Hold and HXGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AMCCF: $8.36 vs. HXGCF: $1.63)
Brand notoriety: AMCCF and HXGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMCCF: 1% vs. HXGCF: 57%
Market capitalization -- AMCCF: $19.25B vs. HXGCF: $331.32M
AMCCF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $19.25B. HXGCF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $331.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMCCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHXGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMCCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HXGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMCCF is a better buy in the long-term than HXGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMCCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HXGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMCCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HXGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMCCF is a better buy in the short-term than HXGCF.

Price Growth

AMCCF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -3.38% price change this week, while HXGCF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.24% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMCCF($19.2B) has a higher market cap than HXGCF($331M). AMCCF YTD gains are higher at: -14.080 vs. HXGCF (-58.734). AMCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.77B vs. HXGCF (-955.68M). AMCCF has more cash in the bank: 827M vs. HXGCF (130M). HXGCF has less debt than AMCCF: HXGCF (2.09B) vs AMCCF (15B). AMCCF has higher revenues than HXGCF: AMCCF (15B) vs HXGCF (4.35B).
AMCCFHXGCFAMCCF / HXGCF
Capitalization19.2B331M5,801%
EBITDA1.77B-955.68M-185%
Gain YTD-14.080-58.73424%
P/E Ratio26.13N/A-
Revenue15B4.35B345%
Total Cash827M130M636%
Total Debt15B2.09B718%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMCCF vs HXGCF: Fundamental Ratings
AMCCF
HXGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9293
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8186
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
184
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMCCF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HXGCF (80). This means that AMCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than HXGCF’s over the last 12 months.

AMCCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGCF (100). This means that AMCCF’s stock grew similarly to HXGCF’s over the last 12 months.

AMCCF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGCF (97). This means that AMCCF’s stock grew similarly to HXGCF’s over the last 12 months.

AMCCF's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGCF (86). This means that AMCCF’s stock grew similarly to HXGCF’s over the last 12 months.

HXGCF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as AMCCF (18). This means that HXGCF’s stock grew similarly to AMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMCCFHXGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADVGX14.710.08
+0.55%
North Square Select Small Cap I
RGECX10.880.05
+0.46%
Russell Inv Global Equity C
FZAPX85.86N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel Z
URLGX3.52N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
CCAFX38.16-0.21
-0.55%
Calvert Mid-Cap A

AMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMCCF and GRVWF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMCCF and GRVWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMCCF
1D Price
Change %
AMCCF100%
N/A
GRVWF - AMCCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFLXF - AMCCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJSF - AMCCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOYFF - AMCCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CADNF - AMCCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More

HXGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HXGCF and CADNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HXGCF and CADNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HXGCF
1D Price
Change %
HXGCF100%
N/A
CADNF - HXGCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
GRVWF - HXGCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOYFF - HXGCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJSF - HXGCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMCCF - HXGCF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More