AMBZ
Price
$42.64
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
295.01M
SFBS
Price
$79.07
Change
+$0.47 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBZ vs SFBS

Header iconAMBZ vs SFBS Comparison
Open Charts AMBZ vs SFBSBanner chart's image
American Business Bank (Los Angeles, CA)
Price$42.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$2.69K
Capitalization295.01M
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$79.07
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
Volume$1.39M
Capitalization3.57B
AMBZ vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBZ vs. SFBS commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBZ is a Buy and SFBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBZ: $42.64 vs. SFBS: $79.07)
Brand notoriety: AMBZ and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBZ: 29% vs. SFBS: 650%
Market capitalization -- AMBZ: $295.01M vs. SFBS: $3.57B
AMBZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $295.01M. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBZ is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the short-term than AMBZ.

Price Growth

AMBZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($3.57B) has a higher market cap than AMBZ($295M). SFBS has higher P/E ratio than AMBZ: SFBS (17.31) vs AMBZ (6.08). AMBZ YTD gains are higher at: -1.974 vs. SFBS (-5.939). SFBS has less debt than AMBZ: SFBS (64.7M) vs AMBZ (486M). SFBS has higher revenues than AMBZ: SFBS (427M) vs AMBZ (137M).
AMBZSFBSAMBZ / SFBS
Capitalization295M3.57B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.974-5.93933%
P/E Ratio6.0817.3135%
Revenue137M427M32%
Total CashN/A112M-
Total Debt486M64.7M751%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBZ vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
AMBZ
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3744
SMR RATING
1..100
2613
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1744
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMBZ's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (26) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (52) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBZSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMVYX28.010.20
+0.72%
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value I
RSGRX32.720.17
+0.52%
Victory RS Growth A
HLIEX25.080.11
+0.44%
JPMorgan Equity Income I
DNSMX22.130.05
+0.23%
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
FBFQX12.550.01
+0.08%
Franklin Managed Income R

AMBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBZ and FUNC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBZ and FUNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBZ
1D Price
Change %
AMBZ100%
+0.02%
FUNC - AMBZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
LOB - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SSB - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
SFBS - AMBZ
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
IBOC - AMBZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with FBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then FBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
+0.60%
FBK - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
ABCB - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
UBSI - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
SSB - SFBS
88%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
SBCF - SFBS
88%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
More