AMBZ
Price
$58.85
Change
+$0.35 (+0.60%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
524.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCF
Price
$15.85
Change
-$0.05 (-0.31%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.65B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBZ vs FCF

Header iconAMBZ vs FCF Comparison
Open Charts AMBZ vs FCFBanner chart's image
American Business Bank (Los Angeles, CA)
Price$58.85
Change+$0.35 (+0.60%)
Volume$94.5K
Capitalization524.92M
First Commonwealth Financial
Price$15.85
Change-$0.05 (-0.31%)
Volume$6.28K
Capitalization1.65B
AMBZ vs FCF Comparison Chart in %
AMBZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBZ vs. FCF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBZ is a StrongBuy and FCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBZ: $58.85 vs. FCF: $15.90)
Brand notoriety: AMBZ and FCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBZ: 900% vs. FCF: 117%
Market capitalization -- AMBZ: $524.92M vs. FCF: $1.65B
AMBZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $524.92M. FCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBZ is a better buy in the long-term than FCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the short-term than AMBZ.

Price Growth

AMBZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.20% price change this week, while FCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCF($1.65B) has a higher market cap than AMBZ($525M). AMBZ has higher P/E ratio than FCF: AMBZ (12.96) vs FCF (11.44). AMBZ YTD gains are higher at: 36.575 vs. FCF (-2.866). FCF has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. AMBZ (112M). AMBZ has less debt than FCF: AMBZ (100M) vs FCF (488M). FCF has higher revenues than AMBZ: FCF (491M) vs AMBZ (128M).
AMBZFCFAMBZ / FCF
Capitalization525M1.65B32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.575-2.866-1,276%
P/E Ratio12.9611.44113%
Revenue128M491M26%
Total Cash112M121M93%
Total Debt100M488M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBZ vs FCF: Fundamental Ratings
AMBZ
FCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
899
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2027
SMR RATING
1..100
3519
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1556
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCF's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (59) in the null industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as FCF (27) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMBZ (35) in the null industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to AMBZ’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FCF (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

AMBZ's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCF (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AMBZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBZFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPDIX13.760.10
+0.73%
EuroPac International Dividend Income I
AGLCX7.430.02
+0.27%
American Century Focused Global Gr C
NWABX35.040.04
+0.11%
Nationwide R6
HGOVX87.38-0.11
-0.13%
Hartford Growth Opportunities R6
CLTIX17.43-0.07
-0.40%
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation I

AMBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBZ and SBSI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBZ and SBSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBZ
1D Price
Change %
AMBZ100%
+0.60%
SBSI - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CUBI - AMBZ
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
FCF - AMBZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
SSB - AMBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
FUNC - AMBZ
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
More

FCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCF has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCF jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCF
1D Price
Change %
FCF100%
-0.69%
PEBO - FCF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
SBSI - FCF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
STBA - FCF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
NWBI - FCF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
IBOC - FCF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
More