AMBR
Price
$9.61
Change
+$1.01 (+11.74%)
Updated
Jul 7, 03:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
606.21M
SANG
Price
$6.46
Change
+$0.10 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jul 7, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
160.31M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBR vs SANG

Header iconAMBR vs SANG Comparison
Open Charts AMBR vs SANGBanner chart's image
Amber International Holding
Price$9.61
Change+$1.01 (+11.74%)
Volume$200
Capitalization606.21M
Sangoma Technologies
Price$6.46
Change+$0.10 (+1.57%)
Volume$300
Capitalization160.31M
AMBR vs SANG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBR vs. SANG commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBR is a Hold and SANG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBR: $9.22 vs. SANG: $6.36)
Brand notoriety: AMBR and SANG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBR: 27% vs. SANG: 13%
Market capitalization -- AMBR: $606.21M vs. SANG: $160.31M
AMBR [@Packaged Software] is valued at $606.21M. SANG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $160.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SANG is a better buy in the long-term than AMBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SANG is a better buy in the short-term than AMBR.

Price Growth

AMBR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.94% price change this week, while SANG (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

SANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.29% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMBR($606M) has a higher market cap than SANG($160M). AMBR YTD gains are higher at: -1.496 vs. SANG (-10.924). SANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.5M vs. AMBR (-1.57M). SANG has more cash in the bank: 10.6M vs. AMBR (9.6M). AMBR has less debt than SANG: AMBR (29.1M) vs SANG (105M). SANG has higher revenues than AMBR: SANG (252M) vs AMBR (21.1M).
AMBRSANGAMBR / SANG
Capitalization606M160M379%
EBITDA-1.57M17.5M-9%
Gain YTD-1.496-10.92414%
P/E RatioN/A909.09-
Revenue21.1M252M8%
Total Cash9.6M10.6M91%
Total Debt29.1M105M28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBR vs SANG: Fundamental Ratings
AMBR
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5048

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMBR's Valuation (85) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (94) in the null industry. This means that AMBR’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

AMBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (100) in the null industry. This means that AMBR’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

SANG's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBR (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SANG’s stock grew similarly to AMBR’s over the last 12 months.

AMBR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (42) in the null industry. This means that AMBR’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

SANG's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBR (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBRSANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLCUX35.480.41
+1.17%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
POAGX46.640.33
+0.71%
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
BASVX13.840.08
+0.58%
Brown Advisory Sustainable Val Inst
PICEX7.300.02
+0.27%
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity C
LHCIX18.540.05
+0.27%
Lord Abbett Health Care I

AMBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBR and BFRG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBR and BFRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBR
1D Price
Change %
AMBR100%
N/A
BFRG - AMBR
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
DH - AMBR
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
SANG - AMBR
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.00%
HTCR - AMBR
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.42%
DBD - AMBR
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
More

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and BTSGU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and BTSGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
+6.00%
BTSGU - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
S - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
CORZ - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
BKKT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
SAP - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
More