AMBR
Price
$5.59
Change
-$0.93 (-14.26%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
523.69M
SANG
Price
$5.92
Change
+$0.13 (+2.25%)
Updated
Aug 15, 10:47 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
197.08M
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBR vs SANG

Header iconAMBR vs SANG Comparison
Open Charts AMBR vs SANGBanner chart's image
Amber International Holding
Price$5.59
Change-$0.93 (-14.26%)
Volume$236.09K
Capitalization523.69M
Sangoma Technologies
Price$5.92
Change+$0.13 (+2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization197.08M
AMBR vs SANG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBR vs. SANG commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBR is a Hold and SANG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBR: $5.59 vs. SANG: $5.79)
Brand notoriety: AMBR and SANG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBR: 127% vs. SANG: 64%
Market capitalization -- AMBR: $523.69M vs. SANG: $197.08M
AMBR [@Computer Communications] is valued at $523.69M. SANG’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $197.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.87T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SANG is a better buy in the long-term than AMBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMBR is a better buy in the short-term than SANG.

Price Growth

AMBR (@Computer Communications) experienced а -14.79% price change this week, while SANG (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

SANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.18% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMBR($524M) has a higher market cap than SANG($197M). SANG YTD gains are higher at: -18.908 vs. AMBR (-40.278). SANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 43.1M vs. AMBR (-10.78M). SANG has higher revenues than AMBR: SANG (238M) vs AMBR (46.7M).
AMBRSANGAMBR / SANG
Capitalization524M197M266%
EBITDA-10.78M43.1M-25%
Gain YTD-40.278-18.908213%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue46.7M238M20%
Total CashN/A16.7M-
Total DebtN/A62.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBR vs SANG: Fundamental Ratings
AMBR
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5037

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMBR's Valuation (81) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (97) in the null industry. This means that AMBR’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

AMBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (100) in the null industry. This means that AMBR’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

SANG's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBR (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SANG’s stock grew similarly to AMBR’s over the last 12 months.

SANG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBR (65) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SANG’s stock grew similarly to AMBR’s over the last 12 months.

SANG's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBR (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBRSANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FANUY15.650.31
+2.02%
Fanuc Corporation
KRNNF134.15N/A
N/A
Krones AG
MSTH0.05N/A
N/A
Mystic Holdings Inc.
PDIYF0.30N/A
-0.83%
Predictive Discovery Ltd.
RMETF0.45-0.04
-8.16%
Rackla Metals Inc

AMBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBR and BLZE have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBR and BLZE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBR
1D Price
Change %
AMBR100%
-14.26%
BLZE - AMBR
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
SANG - AMBR
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DH - AMBR
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
BFRG - AMBR
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
DBD - AMBR
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and BTSGU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and BTSGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
N/A
BTSGU - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
CORZ - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
S - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
BKKT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
BFRG - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
More