AMBP
Price
$3.75
Change
-$0.04 (-1.06%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
4 days until earnings call
BALL
Price
$48.33
Change
+$0.27 (+0.56%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.15B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBP vs BALL

Header iconAMBP vs BALL Comparison
Open Charts AMBP vs BALLBanner chart's image
Ardagh Metal Packaging SA
Price$3.75
Change-$0.04 (-1.06%)
Volume$521.94K
Capitalization2.24B
Ball
Price$48.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.56%)
Volume$2.32M
Capitalization13.15B
AMBP vs BALL Comparison Chart in %
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BALL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBP vs. BALL commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a Hold and BALL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBP: $3.75 vs. BALL: $48.33)
Brand notoriety: AMBP and BALL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBP: 49% vs. BALL: 96%
Market capitalization -- AMBP: $2.24B vs. BALL: $13.15B
AMBP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $2.24B. BALL’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $13.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBALL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BALL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBP is a better buy in the long-term than BALL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BALL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BALL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BALL is a better buy in the short-term than AMBP.

Price Growth

AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +3.31% price change this week, while BALL (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBP is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

BALL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.06% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALL($13.2B) has a higher market cap than AMBP($2.24B). AMBP YTD gains are higher at: 36.426 vs. BALL (-11.334). BALL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.62B vs. AMBP (668M). BALL has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. AMBP (256M). AMBP has less debt than BALL: AMBP (4.06B) vs BALL (7.03B). BALL has higher revenues than AMBP: BALL (12.4B) vs AMBP (5.23B).
AMBPBALLAMBP / BALL
Capitalization2.24B13.2B17%
EBITDA668M1.62B41%
Gain YTD36.426-11.334-321%
P/E RatioN/A23.93-
Revenue5.23B12.4B42%
Total Cash256M296M86%
Total Debt4.06B7.03B58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BALL: Fundamental Ratings
BALL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBPBALL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BALL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HISFX15.240.25
+1.67%
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Instl
TWGIX68.380.30
+0.44%
American Century Growth I
PGRQX21.060.03
+0.14%
PGIM Global Real Estate R6
HFYTX13.27-0.01
-0.08%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R5
HSLVX50.70-0.28
-0.55%
Hartford Small Cap Growth R6

AMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBP
1D Price
Change %
AMBP100%
-1.06%
CCK - AMBP
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
BALL - AMBP
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
AVY - AMBP
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
OI - AMBP
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
SEE - AMBP
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

BALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BALL has been closely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BALL jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BALL
1D Price
Change %
BALL100%
+0.56%
CCK - BALL
68%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
AVY - BALL
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
GPK - BALL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
SLGN - BALL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
SON - BALL
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
More