Advertisement
AMBO vs QUAD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBO is a Hold and QUAD is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMBO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQUAD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AMBO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QUAD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMBO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUAD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMBO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QUAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMBO (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -10.61% price change this week, while QUAD (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMBO is expected to report earnings on Dec 11, 2025.
QUAD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-0.49% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.63% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| AMBO | QUAD | AMBO / QUAD | |
| Capitalization | 10.1M | 331M | 3% |
| EBITDA | 160K | 136M | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 71.429 | -2.365 | -3,020% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.12 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 9.7M | 2.58B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 4.06M | 6.7M | 61% |
| Total Debt | 12.4M | 535M | 2% |
AMBO | QUAD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QUAD's Valuation (17) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBO (95) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that QUAD’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.
QUAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBO (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that QUAD’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.
AMBO's SMR Rating (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QUAD (95) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry. This means that AMBO’s stock grew somewhat faster than QUAD’s over the last 12 months.
AMBO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as QUAD (44) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry. This means that AMBO’s stock grew similarly to QUAD’s over the last 12 months.
QUAD's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBO (99) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that QUAD’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.
| AMBO | QUAD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
AMBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBO and KICK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBO and KICK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBO | 100% | -4.80% | ||
| KICK - AMBO | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TOPPY - AMBO | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QUAD - AMBO | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| MYND - AMBO | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.67% | ||
| YQ - AMBO | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
More | ||||
QUAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUAD has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUAD jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAD | 100% | N/A | ||
| GHC - QUAD | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| BV - QUAD | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| BCO - QUAD | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| STRA - QUAD | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| VRSK - QUAD | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||