AMBO
Price
$3.03
Change
-$0.66 (-17.89%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.65M
QUAD
Price
$6.22
Change
-$0.23 (-3.57%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
313.94M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBO vs QUAD

Header iconAMBO vs QUAD Comparison
Open Charts AMBO vs QUADBanner chart's image
Ambow Education Holding
Price$3.03
Change-$0.66 (-17.89%)
Volume$77.07K
Capitalization8.65M
QUAD/GRAPHICS
Price$6.22
Change-$0.23 (-3.57%)
Volume$306.78K
Capitalization313.94M
AMBO vs QUAD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBO vs. QUAD commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBO is a Hold and QUAD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBO: $3.03 vs. QUAD: $6.22)
Brand notoriety: AMBO and QUAD are both not notable
AMBO represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while QUAD is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBO: 376% vs. QUAD: 113%
Market capitalization -- AMBO: $8.65M vs. QUAD: $313.94M
AMBO [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $8.65M. QUAD’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $313.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQUAD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QUAD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUAD is a better buy in the long-term than AMBO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUAD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QUAD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMBO and QUAD are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMBO (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +9.78% price change this week, while QUAD (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

QUAD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.54% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.85% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUAD($314M) has a higher market cap than AMBO($8.66M). AMBO YTD gains are higher at: 44.286 vs. QUAD (-8.402). AMBO has less debt than QUAD: AMBO (16.2M) vs QUAD (535M).
AMBOQUADAMBO / QUAD
Capitalization8.66M314M3%
EBITDAN/A136M-
Gain YTD44.286-8.402-527%
P/E Ratio4.38N/A-
RevenueN/A2.58B-
Total CashN/A6.7M-
Total Debt16.2M535M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBO vs QUAD: Fundamental Ratings
AMBO
QUAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QUAD's Valuation (20) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBO (94) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that QUAD’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

QUAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBO (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that QUAD’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

QUAD's SMR Rating (95) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry is in the same range as AMBO (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that QUAD’s stock grew similarly to AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

AMBO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as QUAD (44) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry. This means that AMBO’s stock grew similarly to QUAD’s over the last 12 months.

QUAD's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBO (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that QUAD’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBOQUAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSBHF21.570.46
+2.18%
Mitsubishi Corp.
CHBAF8.01N/A
N/A
Chiba Bank, Ltd. (The)
GTMLF0.03N/A
N/A
GREEN TECHNOLOGY METALS LTD.
DPCDF10.50N/A
N/A
DPC DASH LTD
GRUSF0.45-0.01
-3.00%
Grown Rogue International Inc.

AMBO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBO and KICK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBO and KICK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBO
1D Price
Change %
AMBO100%
-17.89%
KICK - AMBO
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOPPY - AMBO
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUAD - AMBO
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
MYND - AMBO
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.25%
YQ - AMBO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More

QUAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUAD has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUAD jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUAD
1D Price
Change %
QUAD100%
-3.57%
GHC - QUAD
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
BV - QUAD
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
BCO - QUAD
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
STRA - QUAD
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
VRSK - QUAD
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More