Advertisement
AMBO vs QSG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBO is a Hold and QSG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMBO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQSG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AMBO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QSG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMBO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMBO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QSG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMBO (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +20.29% price change this week, while QSG (@Recreational Products) price change was -12.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMBO is expected to report earnings on Dec 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-1.96% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Recreational Products (-0.13% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| AMBO | QSG | AMBO / QSG | |
| Capitalization | 11.7M | 327M | 4% |
| EBITDA | 160K | 523M | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 94.762 | 178.241 | 53% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.91 | 6.57 | 90% |
| Revenue | 9.7M | 3.11B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 4.06M | 1.13B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 12.4M | 48.5M | 26% |
AMBO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMBO | QSG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 24 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
AMBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBO has been loosely correlated with KODK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBO jumps, then KODK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBO | 100% | +3.81% | ||
| KODK - AMBO | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| RBA - AMBO | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.41% | ||
| FCN - AMBO | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CRAI - AMBO | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.84% | ||
| MYND - AMBO | 22% Poorly correlated | +9.60% | ||
More | ||||
QSG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QSG and EEIQ have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QSG and EEIQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QSG | 100% | N/A | ||
| EEIQ - QSG | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
| FEDU - QSG | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AFYA - QSG | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| WAFU - QSG | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.32% | ||
| AMBO - QSG | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.81% | ||
More | ||||