AMBO
Price
$2.46
Change
-$0.05 (-1.99%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.88M
79 days until earnings call
KICK
Price
$8.75
Change
-$0.25 (-2.78%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBO vs KICK

Header iconAMBO vs KICK Comparison
Open Charts AMBO vs KICKBanner chart's image
Ambow Education Holding
Price$2.46
Change-$0.05 (-1.99%)
Volume$776
Capitalization4.88M
HPN Holdings
Price$8.75
Change-$0.25 (-2.78%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
AMBO vs KICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBO vs. KICK commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBO is a Hold and KICK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBO: $2.46 vs. KICK: $8.75)
Brand notoriety: AMBO and KICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBO: 6% vs. KICK: 23%
Market capitalization -- AMBO: $4.88M vs. KICK: $0
AMBO [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $4.88M. KICK’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKICK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KICK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KICK is a better buy in the long-term than AMBO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KICK’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KICK’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMBO is a better buy in the short-term than KICK.

Price Growth

AMBO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +1.86% price change this week, while KICK (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBO is expected to report earnings on Sep 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KICK YTD gains are higher at: 446.875 vs. AMBO (17.381).
AMBOKICKAMBO / KICK
Capitalization4.88MN/A-
EBITDA-6.57MN/A-
Gain YTD17.381446.8754%
P/E Ratio18.45N/A-
Revenue11.2MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt16.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBO vs KICK: Fundamental Ratings
AMBO
KICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KICK's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBO (89) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that KICK’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

KICK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBO (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that KICK’s stock grew similarly to AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

AMBO's SMR Rating (96) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as KICK (100) in the null industry. This means that AMBO’s stock grew similarly to KICK’s over the last 12 months.

KICK's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBO (59) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that KICK’s stock grew similarly to AMBO’s over the last 12 months.

AMBO's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KICK (100) in the null industry. This means that AMBO’s stock grew somewhat faster than KICK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBOKICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHFAM13.440.12
+0.90%
Brighthouse Financial
QRVO88.780.50
+0.57%
Qorvo
IVT27.460.13
+0.48%
InvenTrust Properties Corp
LIEN10.22N/A
N/A
Chicago Atlantic BDC Inc
CLOV2.56-0.03
-1.16%
Clover Health Investments Corp

AMBO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMBO and KICK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMBO and KICK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBO
1D Price
Change %
AMBO100%
-1.90%
KICK - AMBO
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOPPY - AMBO
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUAD - AMBO
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
WAFU - AMBO
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
QSG - AMBO
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.10%
More

KICK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KICK has been loosely correlated with FCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KICK jumps, then FCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KICK
1D Price
Change %
KICK100%
N/A
FCN - KICK
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
RBA - KICK
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
AMBO - KICK
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
EEIQ - KICK
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVVBY - KICK
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
More