AMBK
Price
$14.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
36.02M
CMTDF
Price
$28.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
13.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBK vs CMTDF

Header iconAMBK vs CMTDF Comparison
Open Charts AMBK vs CMTDFBanner chart's image
American Bank
Price$14.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization36.02M
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$28.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization13.45B
AMBK vs CMTDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBK vs. CMTDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBK is a Buy and CMTDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBK: $14.85 vs. CMTDF: $28.45)
Brand notoriety: AMBK and CMTDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBK: 59% vs. CMTDF: 27%
Market capitalization -- AMBK: $36.02M vs. CMTDF: $13.45B
AMBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $36.02M. CMTDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMTDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBK is a better buy in the long-term than CMTDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMTDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMTDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMTDF is a better buy in the short-term than AMBK.

Price Growth

AMBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMTDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMTDF($13.5B) has a higher market cap than AMBK($36M). CMTDF YTD gains are higher at: 29.607 vs. AMBK (-8.267). CMTDF has higher revenues than AMBK: CMTDF (1.14T) vs AMBK (10.5M).
AMBKCMTDFAMBK / CMTDF
Capitalization36M13.5B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.26729.607-28%
P/E RatioN/A10.76-
Revenue10.5M1.14T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt83.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBK vs CMTDF: Fundamental Ratings
AMBK
CMTDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3347
SMR RATING
1..100
5100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4898
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMBK's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (52). This means that AMBK’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

AMBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (47). This means that AMBK’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

AMBK's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMTDF (100). This means that AMBK’s stock grew significantly faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBK (59). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to AMBK’s over the last 12 months.

AMBK's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMTDF (98). This means that AMBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBKCMTDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMTDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKSC14.55N/A
N/A
Bank of South Carolina Corp.
BDRFF125.70N/A
N/A
Beiersdorf AG
REMI0.01N/A
N/A
Remedent, Inc.
CTXAY33.78-0.08
-0.24%
Ampol Ltd.
AKCCF0.03N/A
-10.06%
AKER CARBON CAPTURE ASA

AMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBK has been loosely correlated with COSO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBK jumps, then COSO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBK
1D Price
Change %
AMBK100%
N/A
COSO - AMBK
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - AMBK
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBH - AMBK
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CWBK - AMBK
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
SVKEF - AMBK
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMTDF has been loosely correlated with FSGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMTDF jumps, then FSGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTDF
1D Price
Change %
CMTDF100%
N/A
FSGB - CMTDF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BPIRF - CMTDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - CMTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
AMBK - CMTDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCBC - CMTDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
More