It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMBBY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWILYY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMBBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WILYY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMBBY (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +4.63% price change this week, while WILYY (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -5.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +7.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.22%.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
AMBBY | WILYY | AMBBY / WILYY | |
Capitalization | 3.79B | 8.14B | 47% |
EBITDA | 834M | 5.8B | 14% |
Gain YTD | 10.334 | 1.782 | 580% |
P/E Ratio | 66.33 | 19.41 | 342% |
Revenue | 5.83B | 22.4B | 26% |
Total Cash | 640M | 1.11B | 58% |
Total Debt | 554M | 15.7B | 4% |
AMBBY | WILYY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 1 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WILYY's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBBY (98). This means that WILYY’s stock grew similarly to AMBBY’s over the last 12 months.
WILYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBBY (100). This means that WILYY’s stock grew similarly to AMBBY’s over the last 12 months.
AMBBY's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as WILYY (98). This means that AMBBY’s stock grew similarly to WILYY’s over the last 12 months.
WILYY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBBY (82). This means that WILYY’s stock grew similarly to AMBBY’s over the last 12 months.
WILYY's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBBY (91). This means that WILYY’s stock grew similarly to AMBBY’s over the last 12 months.
AMBBY | WILYY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 5 days ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago50% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago51% | 3 days ago49% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago46% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
REW | 6.74 | 0.12 | +1.74% |
ProShares UltraShort Technology | |||
BRLN | 52.11 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF | |||
SHYM | 22.03 | -0.08 | -0.38% |
iShares Short Duration HY Muni Act ETF | |||
EIDO | 18.50 | -0.13 | -0.70% |
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | |||
ETW | 8.83 | -0.07 | -0.83% |
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBBY has been loosely correlated with ICCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBBY jumps, then ICCM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMBBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMBBY | 100% | N/A | ||
ICCM - AMBBY | 35% Loosely correlated | +6.74% | ||
MDXH - AMBBY | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
VTAK - AMBBY | 25% Poorly correlated | -10.74% | ||
SAFLF - AMBBY | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CLPBY - AMBBY | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that WILYY and ESLOY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WILYY and ESLOY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WILYY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WILYY | 100% | N/A | ||
ESLOY - WILYY | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
ESLOF - WILYY | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
MEDP - WILYY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
AMBBY - WILYY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WILLF - WILYY | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.41% | ||
More |