AMBBY
Price
$15.35
Change
-$0.42 (-2.66%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.1B
CLPBY
Price
$8.54
Change
-$0.41 (-4.58%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBBY vs CLPBY

Header iconAMBBY vs CLPBY Comparison
Open Charts AMBBY vs CLPBYBanner chart's image
Ambu A/S
Price$15.35
Change-$0.42 (-2.66%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.1B
Coloplast AS
Price$8.54
Change-$0.41 (-4.58%)
Volume$392.9K
Capitalization20.38B
AMBBY vs CLPBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBBY vs. CLPBY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBBY is a Hold and CLPBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBBY: $15.35 vs. CLPBY: $8.95)
Brand notoriety: AMBBY and CLPBY are both not notable
AMBBY represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while CLPBY is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBBY: 5% vs. CLPBY: 103%
Market capitalization -- AMBBY: $4.1B vs. CLPBY: $20.38B
AMBBY [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $4.1B. CLPBY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $20.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $232.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $157.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.52B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBBY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLPBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLPBY is a better buy in the long-term than AMBBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLPBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMBBY is a better buy in the short-term than CLPBY.

Price Growth

AMBBY (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while CLPBY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -4.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.05%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLPBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.09% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-3.35% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPBY($20.4B) has a higher market cap than AMBBY($4.1B). AMBBY has higher P/E ratio than CLPBY: AMBBY (72.38) vs CLPBY (29.83). AMBBY YTD gains are higher at: 17.896 vs. CLPBY (-16.935). CLPBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.34B vs. AMBBY (830M). AMBBY (751M) and CLPBY (726M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . AMBBY has less debt than CLPBY: AMBBY (534M) vs CLPBY (24.2B). CLPBY has higher revenues than AMBBY: CLPBY (27.9B) vs AMBBY (5.96B).
AMBBYCLPBYAMBBY / CLPBY
Capitalization4.1B20.4B20%
EBITDA830M8.34B10%
Gain YTD17.896-16.935-106%
P/E Ratio72.3829.83243%
Revenue5.96B27.9B21%
Total Cash751M726M103%
Total Debt534M24.2B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBBY vs CLPBY: Fundamental Ratings
AMBBY
CLPBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7551
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8238
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5274
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLPBY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBBY (98). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBBY’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBBY (100). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew similarly to AMBBY’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBY's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBBY (82). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBBY’s over the last 12 months.

AMBBY's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBY (81). This means that AMBBY’s stock grew similarly to CLPBY’s over the last 12 months.

AMBBY's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBY (74). This means that AMBBY’s stock grew similarly to CLPBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBBYCLPBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPI20.68N/A
N/A
Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Opportunities Fund
FIXP19.85N/A
N/A
FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Inc Prm ETF
QVML38.77-0.16
-0.42%
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
GSJY45.18-0.31
-0.68%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF
DULL2.76-0.03
-1.08%
MicroSectors™ Gold -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN

AMBBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBBY has been loosely correlated with ICCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBBY jumps, then ICCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBBY
1D Price
Change %
AMBBY100%
N/A
ICCM - AMBBY
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
MDXH - AMBBY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
VTAK - AMBBY
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
SAFLF - AMBBY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPBY - AMBBY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLPBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLPBY has been loosely correlated with SMMNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLPBY jumps, then SMMNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPBY
1D Price
Change %
CLPBY100%
N/A
SMMNY - CLPBY
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SAUHY - CLPBY
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ESLOY - CLPBY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WILLF - CLPBY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMBBY - CLPBY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More