AMAL
Price
$26.72
Change
+$0.19 (+0.72%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
732.23M
4 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$19.31
Change
+$0.14 (+0.73%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.9B
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMAL vs RF

Header iconAMAL vs RF Comparison
Open Charts AMAL vs RFBanner chart's image
Amalgamated Financial
Price$26.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.72%)
Volume$144.61K
Capitalization732.23M
Regions Financial
Price$19.31
Change+$0.14 (+0.73%)
Volume$18.65M
Capitalization18.9B
AMAL vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. RF commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a Hold and RF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (AMAL: $26.72 vs. RF: $19.31)
Brand notoriety: AMAL: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 50% vs. RF: 194%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $732.23M vs. RF: $18.9B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $732.23M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMAL and RF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMAL is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.83% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than AMAL($732M). RF has higher P/E ratio than AMAL: RF (9.74) vs AMAL (8.10). RF YTD gains are higher at: -17.025 vs. AMAL (-19.849). RF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. AMAL (5.49M). AMAL has less debt than RF: AMAL (336M) vs RF (2.33B). RF has higher revenues than AMAL: RF (7.57B) vs AMAL (286M).
AMALRFAMAL / RF
Capitalization732M18.9B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.849-17.025117%
P/E Ratio8.109.7483%
Revenue286M7.57B4%
Total Cash5.49M1.55B0%
Total Debt336M2.33B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2327
SMR RATING
1..100
167
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4140
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (57) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (27) in the Major Banks industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (16) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
+0.72%
BY - AMAL
81%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
CTBI - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
TRMK - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
HWC - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
ASB - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with AUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then AUB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.73%
AUB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
HOMB - RF
79%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
OZK - RF
76%
Closely correlated
+5.82%
AMAL - RF
74%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
HTH - RF
74%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
More