AMAL
Price
$27.69
Change
+$0.27 (+0.98%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
833.72M
24 days until earnings call
IBCP
Price
$31.53
Change
+$0.17 (+0.54%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
652.97M
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAL vs IBCP

Header iconAMAL vs IBCP Comparison
Open Charts AMAL vs IBCPBanner chart's image
Amalgamated Financial
Price$27.69
Change+$0.27 (+0.98%)
Volume$84.51K
Capitalization833.72M
Independent Bank
Price$31.53
Change+$0.17 (+0.54%)
Volume$67.91K
Capitalization652.97M
AMAL vs IBCP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. IBCP commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a StrongBuy and IBCP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AMAL: $27.69 vs. IBCP: $31.53)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and IBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 49% vs. IBCP: 77%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $833.72M vs. IBCP: $652.97M
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $833.72M. IBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $652.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIBCP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IBCP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBCP is a better buy in the long-term than AMAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMAL and IBCP are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while IBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

IBCP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMAL($834M) has a higher market cap than IBCP($653M). IBCP has higher P/E ratio than AMAL: IBCP (10.30) vs AMAL (8.29). IBCP YTD gains are higher at: -7.250 vs. AMAL (-16.138). IBCP has more cash in the bank: 74.4M vs. AMAL (4.05M). AMAL has less debt than IBCP: AMAL (90.9M) vs IBCP (181M). AMAL has higher revenues than IBCP: AMAL (321M) vs IBCP (216M).
AMALIBCPAMAL / IBCP
Capitalization834M653M128%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.138-7.250223%
P/E Ratio8.2910.3080%
Revenue321M216M149%
Total Cash4.05M74.4M5%
Total Debt90.9M181M50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs IBCP: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
IBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3325
SMR RATING
1..100
2028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6547
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBCP's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (55). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (33). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (28). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (78). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (65). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALIBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WHGQX14.110.10
+0.71%
Westwood Quality Value Ultra
IESGX25.760.18
+0.70%
Sit ESG Growth I
FTTEX14.440.07
+0.49%
Fidelity Advisor Total Intl Equity M
NSBRX66.730.32
+0.48%
Nuveen Dividend Growth I
MRBPX24.220.08
+0.33%
BlackRock Balanced R

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
+0.98%
CTBI - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
SHBI - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
ASB - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
IBCP - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
UVSP - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
More

IBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBCP has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBCP jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBCP
1D Price
Change %
IBCP100%
+0.54%
MCBS - IBCP
89%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
CTBI - IBCP
89%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
BY - IBCP
89%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
STBA - IBCP
89%
Closely correlated
N/A
FMBH - IBCP
88%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
More