AMAL
Price
$36.46
Change
-$0.21 (-0.57%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
69 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$59.41
Change
-$0.38 (-0.64%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMAL vs HWC

Header iconAMAL vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts AMAL vs HWCBanner chart's image
Amalgamated Financial
Price$36.46
Change-$0.21 (-0.57%)
Volume$302.31K
CapitalizationN/A
Hancock Whitney
Price$59.41
Change-$0.38 (-0.64%)
Volume$434.21K
CapitalizationN/A
AMAL vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. HWC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a StrongBuy and HWC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (AMAL: $36.46 vs. HWC: $59.41)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 167% vs. HWC: 80%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $732.23M vs. HWC: $4B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $732.23M. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMAL and HWC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMAL and HWC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.23% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than AMAL($732M). HWC has higher P/E ratio than AMAL: HWC (9.98) vs AMAL (8.10). AMAL YTD gains are higher at: 37.603 vs. HWC (25.175). HWC has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. AMAL (5.49M). AMAL has less debt than HWC: AMAL (336M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than AMAL: HWC (1.37B) vs AMAL (286M).
AMALHWCAMAL / HWC
Capitalization732M4B18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.60325.175149%
P/E Ratio8.109.9881%
Revenue286M1.37B21%
Total Cash5.49M561M1%
Total Debt336M1.52B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1734
SMR RATING
1..100
1611
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (82). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (34). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (16). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (40). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (25). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
-0.57%
BHLB - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
BY - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
FHB - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
BANR - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
CTBI - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-0.64%
ASB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-2.16%
FNB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
HOMB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
CADE - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
ABCB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
More