AMAL
Price
$27.87
Change
-$0.02 (-0.07%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
836.12M
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CBGPY
Price
$11.02
Change
-$0.12 (-1.08%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Capitalization
858.86M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAL vs CBGPY

Header iconAMAL vs CBGPY Comparison
Open Charts AMAL vs CBGPYBanner chart's image
Amalgamated Financial
Price$27.87
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
Volume$2.29K
Capitalization836.12M
Close Brothers Group
Price$11.02
Change-$0.12 (-1.08%)
Volume$902
Capitalization858.86M
AMAL vs CBGPY Comparison Chart in %
AMAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CBGPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. CBGPY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a StrongBuy and CBGPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AMAL: $27.89 vs. CBGPY: $11.02)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and CBGPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 79% vs. CBGPY: 129%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $834.33M vs. CBGPY: $878.49M
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $834.33M. CBGPY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $878.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBGPY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBGPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBGPY is a better buy in the long-term than AMAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBGPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CBGPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMAL is a better buy in the short-term than CBGPY.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.14% price change this week, while CBGPY (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBGPY($859M) and AMAL($836M) have the same market capitalization . AMAL has higher P/E ratio than CBGPY: AMAL (8.41) vs CBGPY (5.58). CBGPY YTD gains are higher at: 88.376 vs. AMAL (-15.098). AMAL has less debt than CBGPY: AMAL (90.9M) vs CBGPY (2.19B). CBGPY has higher revenues than AMAL: CBGPY (769M) vs AMAL (321M).
AMALCBGPYAMAL / CBGPY
Capitalization836M859M97%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.09888.376-17%
P/E Ratio8.415.58151%
Revenue321M769M42%
Total Cash4.05MN/A-
Total Debt90.9M2.19B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs CBGPY: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
CBGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1029
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
2018
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBGPY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMAL (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBGPY (100) in the null industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew significantly faster than CBGPY’s over the last 12 months.

CBGPY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as AMAL (20) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBGPY’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

CBGPY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as AMAL (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBGPY’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

CBGPY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMAL (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALCBGPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CBGPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYHIX139.671.14
+0.82%
Rydex Health Care Inv
BRLGX39.220.05
+0.13%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Growth R5
CMGVX33.35-0.08
-0.24%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I2
BSGRX15.40-0.06
-0.39%
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Gr R
CSJRX67.39-0.63
-0.93%
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares R

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with OSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then OSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
-1.86%
OSBC - AMAL
82%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
BY - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
CATY - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
FNB - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
WSFS - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
More

CBGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBGPY and LYG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBGPY and LYG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBGPY
1D Price
Change %
CBGPY100%
N/A
LYG - CBGPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
ADBKF - CBGPY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBAM - CBGPY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
NEFB - CBGPY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMAL - CBGPY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
More