It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMADY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFIS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMADY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMADY (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -4.27% price change this week, while FIS (@Information Technology Services) price change was +2.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.60%.
AMADY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
FIS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
AMADY | FIS | AMADY / FIS | |
Capitalization | 30.8B | 47.6B | 65% |
EBITDA | N/A | 3.97B | - |
Gain YTD | -0.802 | 49.368 | -2% |
P/E Ratio | 24.92 | 91.20 | 27% |
Revenue | N/A | 10B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 1.32B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 11B | - |
AMADY | FIS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 21 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMADY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FIS (32) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that AMADY’s stock grew similarly to FIS’s over the last 12 months.
AMADY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FIS (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that AMADY’s stock grew similarly to FIS’s over the last 12 months.
AMADY's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FIS (78) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that AMADY’s stock grew similarly to FIS’s over the last 12 months.
FIS's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as AMADY (52) in the null industry. This means that FIS’s stock grew similarly to AMADY’s over the last 12 months.
FIS's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as AMADY (58) in the null industry. This means that FIS’s stock grew similarly to AMADY’s over the last 12 months.
AMADY | FIS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago55% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 10 days ago0% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago61% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMADY and III have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMADY and III's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMADY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMADY | 100% | -1.16% | ||
III - AMADY | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
FIS - AMADY | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
FI - AMADY | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
CDW - AMADY | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.82% | ||
INOD - AMADY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIS has been loosely correlated with FI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIS jumps, then FI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FIS | 100% | -0.47% | ||
FI - FIS | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
JKHY - FIS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
ASGN - FIS | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.78% | ||
EXLS - FIS | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
BR - FIS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
More |