AMADF
Price
$83.03
Change
-$3.36 (-3.89%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
36.67B
WNS
Price
$74.72
Change
-$0.06 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.21B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMADF vs WNS

Header iconAMADF vs WNS Comparison
Open Charts AMADF vs WNSBanner chart's image
Amadeus IT Group SA
Price$83.03
Change-$3.36 (-3.89%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization36.67B
WNS (Holdings)
Price$74.72
Change-$0.06 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization3.21B
AMADF vs WNS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMADF vs. WNS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMADF is a Hold and WNS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AMADF: $83.03 vs. WNS: $74.72)
Brand notoriety: AMADF and WNS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMADF: 68% vs. WNS: 50%
Market capitalization -- AMADF: $36.67B vs. WNS: $3.21B
AMADF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $36.67B. WNS’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $241.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWNS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WNS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMADF is a better buy in the long-term than WNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMADF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMADF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WNS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WNS is a better buy in the short-term than AMADF.

Price Growth

AMADF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while WNS (@Information Technology Services) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

WNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-1.00% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMADF($36.7B) has a higher market cap than WNS($3.21B). AMADF has higher P/E ratio than WNS: AMADF (24.49) vs WNS (20.87). WNS YTD gains are higher at: 57.670 vs. AMADF (15.045). AMADF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.4B vs. WNS (281M). AMADF has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. WNS (264M). WNS has less debt than AMADF: WNS (438M) vs AMADF (3.53B). AMADF has higher revenues than WNS: AMADF (6.28B) vs WNS (1.32B).
AMADFWNSAMADF / WNS
Capitalization36.7B3.21B1,145%
EBITDA2.4B281M856%
Gain YTD15.04557.67026%
P/E Ratio24.4920.87117%
Revenue6.28B1.32B477%
Total Cash1.49B264M566%
Total Debt3.53B438M806%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMADF vs WNS: Fundamental Ratings
AMADF
WNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5087
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5269
SMR RATING
1..100
3843
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMADF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WNS (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AMADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WNS’s over the last 12 months.

AMADF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as WNS (69) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AMADF’s stock grew similarly to WNS’s over the last 12 months.

AMADF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as WNS (43) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AMADF’s stock grew similarly to WNS’s over the last 12 months.

WNS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as AMADF (49) in the null industry. This means that WNS’s stock grew similarly to AMADF’s over the last 12 months.

AMADF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as WNS (49) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AMADF’s stock grew similarly to WNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMADFWNS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRCT0.560.02
+2.85%
Direct Digital Holdings
GEHC77.610.88
+1.14%
GE HealthCare Technologies
RSKD5.41N/A
N/A
Riskified Ltd
ZLAB37.17-0.60
-1.59%
Zai Lab Limited
SABS2.55-0.05
-1.92%
SAB Biotherapeutics

AMADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMADF and NURAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMADF and NURAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMADF
1D Price
Change %
AMADF100%
-3.90%
NURAF - AMADF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
NGRRF - AMADF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FJTSY - AMADF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
WNS - AMADF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
FI - AMADF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
More

WNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WNS has been loosely correlated with G. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WNS jumps, then G could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WNS
1D Price
Change %
WNS100%
-0.08%
G - WNS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
CTSH - WNS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
BR - WNS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
EXLS - WNS
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
GIB - WNS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More