AMADF vs NGRRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMADF is a Hold and NGRRF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNGRRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NGRRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
AMADF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -1.12% price change this week, while NGRRF (@Information Technology Services) price change was +4.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.84%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (+0.45% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| AMADF | NGRRF | AMADF / NGRRF | |
| Capitalization | 30.3B | 1.06B | 2,872% |
| EBITDA | 2.32B | 136M | 1,707% |
| Gain YTD | -1.025 | -0.241 | 426% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.68 | 19.45 | 127% |
| Revenue | 5.96B | 947M | 629% |
| Total Cash | 1.01B | 147M | 690% |
| Total Debt | 3.72B | 324M | 1,148% |
AMADF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
NGRRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NGRRF and HUBV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NGRRF and HUBV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NGRRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGRRF | 100% | +1.95% | ||
| HUBV - NGRRF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CGEMY - NGRRF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AMADF - NGRRF | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.12% | ||
| CAPMF - NGRRF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| CTSDF - NGRRF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||