AMADF
Price
$63.71
Change
-$14.13 (-18.15%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NGRRF
Price
$78.43
Change
+$16.10 (+25.83%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMADF vs NGRRF

Header iconAMADF vs NGRRF Comparison
Open Charts AMADF vs NGRRFBanner chart's image
Amadeus IT Group SA
Price$63.71
Change-$14.13 (-18.15%)
Volume$8.22K
Capitalization27.4B
Nagarro SE
Price$78.43
Change+$16.10 (+25.83%)
Volume$308
Capitalization1.06B
AMADF vs NGRRF Comparison Chart in %
AMADF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NGRRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMADF vs. NGRRF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMADF is a Hold and NGRRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (AMADF: $63.71 vs. NGRRF: $78.43)
Brand notoriety: AMADF and NGRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMADF: 145% vs. NGRRF: 45%
Market capitalization -- AMADF: $27.4B vs. NGRRF: $1.06B
AMADF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $27.4B. NGRRF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $1.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $275.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNGRRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NGRRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NGRRF is a better buy in the long-term than AMADF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMADF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGRRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMADF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NGRRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMADF and NGRRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMADF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -7.89% price change this week, while NGRRF (@Information Technology Services) price change was -9.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -4.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-4.56% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMADF($27.4B) has a higher market cap than NGRRF($1.06B). AMADF (17.82) and NGRRF (17.63) have similar P/E ratio . AMADF YTD gains are higher at: -12.473 vs. NGRRF (-14.503). AMADF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.5B vs. NGRRF (145M). AMADF has more cash in the bank: 968M vs. NGRRF (137M). NGRRF has less debt than AMADF: NGRRF (372M) vs AMADF (3.33B). AMADF has higher revenues than NGRRF: AMADF (6.44B) vs NGRRF (1B).
AMADFNGRRFAMADF / NGRRF
Capitalization27.4B1.06B2,585%
EBITDA2.5B145M1,723%
Gain YTD-12.473-14.50386%
P/E Ratio17.8217.63101%
Revenue6.44B1B644%
Total Cash968M137M707%
Total Debt3.33B372M894%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMADF: Fundamental Ratings
AMADF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMADFNGRRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMADF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NGRRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SREAX14.080.09
+0.64%
PGIM Select Real Estate A
MALVX34.430.08
+0.23%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Val Instl
SCSMX18.93-0.07
-0.37%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth C
PSEPX20.20-0.09
-0.44%
1789 Growth and Income P
OGLCX62.69-1.77
-2.75%
Invesco Global C

AMADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMADF has been loosely correlated with AMADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMADF jumps, then AMADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMADF
1D Price
Change %
AMADF100%
-4.36%
AMADY - AMADF
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.02%
NURAF - AMADF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGRRF - AMADF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.24%
DMRC - AMADF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.01%
FJTSY - AMADF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
More

NGRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NGRRF and AMADY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NGRRF and AMADY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGRRF
1D Price
Change %
NGRRF100%
-8.24%
AMADY - NGRRF
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
HUBV - NGRRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASGN - NGRRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
DXC - NGRRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-11.65%
CGEMY - NGRRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-8.98%
More