AMADF
Price
$82.09
Change
-$2.41 (-2.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
36.47B
NGRRF
Price
$71.66
Change
+$0.83 (+1.17%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
917.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMADF vs NGRRF

Header iconAMADF vs NGRRF Comparison
Open Charts AMADF vs NGRRFBanner chart's image
Amadeus IT Group SA
Price$82.09
Change-$2.41 (-2.85%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization36.47B
Nagarro SE
Price$71.66
Change+$0.83 (+1.17%)
Volume$140
Capitalization917.02M
AMADF vs NGRRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMADF vs. NGRRF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMADF is a Hold and NGRRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMADF: $82.09 vs. NGRRF: $71.66)
Brand notoriety: AMADF and NGRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMADF: 88% vs. NGRRF: 52%
Market capitalization -- AMADF: $35.98B vs. NGRRF: $917.02M
AMADF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $35.98B. NGRRF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $917.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $271.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNGRRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NGRRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMADF is a better buy in the long-term than NGRRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMADF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGRRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMADF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NGRRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMADF is a better buy in the short-term than NGRRF.

Price Growth

AMADF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +0.59% price change this week, while NGRRF (@Information Technology Services) price change was +7.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+2.78% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMADF($36.5B) has a higher market cap than NGRRF($917M). AMADF has higher P/E ratio than NGRRF: AMADF (24.14) vs NGRRF (18.39). AMADF YTD gains are higher at: 13.740 vs. NGRRF (-12.348). AMADF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.4B vs. NGRRF (135M). AMADF has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. NGRRF (172M). NGRRF has less debt than AMADF: NGRRF (369M) vs AMADF (3.53B). AMADF has higher revenues than NGRRF: AMADF (6.28B) vs NGRRF (981M).
AMADFNGRRFAMADF / NGRRF
Capitalization36.5B917M3,980%
EBITDA2.4B135M1,781%
Gain YTD13.740-12.348-111%
P/E Ratio24.1418.39131%
Revenue6.28B981M640%
Total Cash1.49B172M868%
Total Debt3.53B369M956%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMADF: Fundamental Ratings
AMADF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
38
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMADFNGRRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRBCX28.200.35
+1.26%
JHancock Regional Bank C
VGIAX109.301.02
+0.94%
Vanguard Growth & Income Adm
BIALX30.100.19
+0.64%
Brown Advisory Global Leaders Investor
CGVVX14.410.08
+0.56%
Causeway Global Value Inv
QCBGX22.190.09
+0.41%
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C

AMADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMADF and NURAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMADF and NURAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMADF
1D Price
Change %
AMADF100%
-2.86%
NURAF - AMADF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
NGRRF - AMADF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FJTSY - AMADF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
WNS - AMADF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
FI - AMADF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More

NGRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NGRRF and HUBV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NGRRF and HUBV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGRRF
1D Price
Change %
NGRRF100%
N/A
HUBV - NGRRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGEMY - NGRRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
AMADF - NGRRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
CAPMF - NGRRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
WIZEY - NGRRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More