ALVLF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
14.6M
PGLDF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALVLF vs PGLDF

Header iconALVLF vs PGLDF Comparison
Open Charts ALVLF vs PGLDFBanner chart's image
Big Ridge Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.7K
Capitalization14.6M
P2 Gold
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$110.16K
Capitalization16M
ALVLF vs PGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALVLF vs. PGLDF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALVLF is a Hold and PGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ALVLF: $0.07 vs. PGLDF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: ALVLF and PGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALVLF: 12% vs. PGLDF: 166%
Market capitalization -- ALVLF: $14.6M vs. PGLDF: $16M
ALVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $14.6M. PGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PGLDF is a better buy in the long-term than ALVLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALVLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGLDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALVLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than ALVLF.

Price Growth

ALVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.11% price change this week, while PGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGLDF($16M) has a higher market cap than ALVLF($14.6M). PGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 157.590 vs. ALVLF (8.060). ALVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.42M vs. PGLDF (-12.93M). ALVLF has more cash in the bank: 1.09M vs. PGLDF (378K). ALVLF has less debt than PGLDF: ALVLF (45.4K) vs PGLDF (101K). ALVLF (0) and PGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ALVLFPGLDFALVLF / PGLDF
Capitalization14.6M16M91%
EBITDA-3.42M-12.93M26%
Gain YTD8.060157.5905%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.09M378K288%
Total Debt45.4K101K45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALVLF: Fundamental Ratings
ALVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVLFPGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCHN0.02N/A
N/A
Rouchon Industries, Inc.
CNSRF9.82N/A
N/A
Coinshares International Limited
XNGSF8.36N/A
N/A
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.
AIIXY34.02N/A
N/A
Aixtron SE
ORBT3.45-0.05
-1.43%
Orbit International Corp.

ALVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALVLF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALVLF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALVLF
1D Price
Change %
ALVLF100%
+6.47%
BYAGF - ALVLF
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
LECRF - ALVLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KDKCF - ALVLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
PGLDF - ALVLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
NSGCF - ALVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-9.37%
More

PGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGLDF and ZCTSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGLDF and ZCTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGLDF
1D Price
Change %
PGLDF100%
+3.79%
ZCTSF - PGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVRF - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
ALVLF - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.47%
EOGSF - PGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMGF - PGLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More