ALVLF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
31.63M
NSGCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALVLF vs NSGCF

Header iconALVLF vs NSGCF Comparison
Open Charts ALVLF vs NSGCFBanner chart's image
Big Ridge Gold
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$393.71K
Capitalization31.63M
NORTHSTAR GOLD
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization2.82M
ALVLF vs NSGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALVLF vs. NSGCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALVLF is a Hold and NSGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ALVLF: $0.13 vs. NSGCF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: ALVLF and NSGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALVLF: 130% vs. NSGCF: 2%
Market capitalization -- ALVLF: $31.63M vs. NSGCF: $2.82M
ALVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $31.63M. NSGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNSGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NSGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALVLF is a better buy in the long-term than NSGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALVLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSGCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALVLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NSGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALVLF is a better buy in the short-term than NSGCF.

Price Growth

ALVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +20.00% price change this week, while NSGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALVLF($31.6M) has a higher market cap than NSGCF($2.82M). ALVLF YTD gains are higher at: 88.060 vs. NSGCF (-1.362). NSGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.69M vs. ALVLF (-3.31M). ALVLF has more cash in the bank: 336K vs. NSGCF (281K). ALVLF (0) and NSGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ALVLFNSGCFALVLF / NSGCF
Capitalization31.6M2.82M1,121%
EBITDA-3.31M-1.69M195%
Gain YTD88.060-1.362-6,464%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash336K281K120%
Total Debt34KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALVLF: Fundamental Ratings
ALVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVLFNSGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUL61.292.33
+3.95%
HB Fuller Company
SVRE1.840.04
+2.22%
SaverOne 2014 Ltd
SIBN16.350.13
+0.80%
SI-BONE
FE43.470.07
+0.16%
FirstEnergy Corp
DCGO1.51-0.04
-2.58%
DocGo

ALVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALVLF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALVLF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALVLF
1D Price
Change %
ALVLF100%
+0.48%
BYAGF - ALVLF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
NSGCF - ALVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
NSUPF - ALVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
CBGZF - ALVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
AMXEF - ALVLF
14%
Poorly correlated
-8.96%
More

NSGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSGCF and CALRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSGCF and CALRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSGCF
1D Price
Change %
NSGCF100%
-0.26%
CALRF - NSGCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALVLF - NSGCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
GGLDF - NSGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
NSUPF - NSGCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
NVGLF - NSGCF
-9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More