ALVLF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.69M
NSGCF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALVLF vs NSGCF

Header iconALVLF vs NSGCF Comparison
Open Charts ALVLF vs NSGCFBanner chart's image
Big Ridge Gold
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$200K
Capitalization30.69M
NORTHSTAR GOLD
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$59.12K
Capitalization2.81M
ALVLF vs NSGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALVLF vs. NSGCF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALVLF is a Hold and NSGCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ALVLF: $0.13 vs. NSGCF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: ALVLF and NSGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALVLF: 68% vs. NSGCF: 66%
Market capitalization -- ALVLF: $30.69M vs. NSGCF: $2.81M
ALVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $30.69M. NSGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNSGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NSGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ALVLF and NSGCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALVLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSGCF’s TA Score has 9 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALVLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NSGCF’s TA Score: 9 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSGCF is a better buy in the short-term than ALVLF.

Price Growth

ALVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.56% price change this week, while NSGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALVLF($30.7M) has a higher market cap than NSGCF($2.81M). ALVLF YTD gains are higher at: 98.507 vs. NSGCF (36.226). NSGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.69M vs. ALVLF (-3.31M). ALVLF has more cash in the bank: 336K vs. NSGCF (281K). ALVLF (0) and NSGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ALVLFNSGCFALVLF / NSGCF
Capitalization30.7M2.81M1,093%
EBITDA-3.31M-1.69M195%
Gain YTD98.50736.226272%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash336K281K120%
Total Debt34KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALVLF: Fundamental Ratings
ALVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVLFNSGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNECY6.150.08
+1.32%
Renesas Electronics Corp
BZYR0.03N/A
N/A
Burzynski Research Institute, Inc.
PHTCF20.52N/A
N/A
PLDT Inc.
VULC0.01N/A
N/A
Vulcan International Corp.
OTCM53.11-0.89
-1.66%
OTC Markets Group Inc.

ALVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALVLF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALVLF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALVLF
1D Price
Change %
ALVLF100%
-8.09%
BYAGF - ALVLF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
NSGCF - ALVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - ALVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
CBGZF - ALVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.70%
AMXEF - ALVLF
14%
Poorly correlated
+10.13%
More

NSGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSGCF and CALRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSGCF and CALRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSGCF
1D Price
Change %
NSGCF100%
N/A
CALRF - NSGCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALVLF - NSGCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGLDF - NSGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - NSGCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVGLF - NSGCF
-9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More