ALVLF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
54.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BYAGF
Price
$0.87
Change
+$0.01 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
359.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALVLF vs BYAGF

Header iconALVLF vs BYAGF Comparison
Open Charts ALVLF vs BYAGFBanner chart's image
Big Ridge Gold
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$245.59K
Capitalization54.28M
Banyan Gold
Price$0.87
Change+$0.01 (+1.16%)
Volume$311.11K
Capitalization359.33M
ALVLF vs BYAGF Comparison Chart in %
ALVLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BYAGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALVLF vs. BYAGF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALVLF is a Hold and BYAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (ALVLF: $0.20 vs. BYAGF: $0.87)
Brand notoriety: ALVLF and BYAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALVLF: 84% vs. BYAGF: 82%
Market capitalization -- ALVLF: $54.28M vs. BYAGF: $359.33M
ALVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $54.28M. BYAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $359.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $144.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBYAGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BYAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYAGF is a better buy in the long-term than ALVLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALVLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYAGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALVLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BYAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BYAGF is a better buy in the short-term than ALVLF.

Price Growth

ALVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while BYAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.41% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYAGF($359M) has a higher market cap than ALVLF($54.3M). BYAGF YTD gains are higher at: 31.452 vs. ALVLF (2.620). ALVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.04M vs. BYAGF (-3.43M). BYAGF has more cash in the bank: 17.9M vs. ALVLF (1.36M). ALVLF (0) and BYAGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ALVLFBYAGFALVLF / BYAGF
Capitalization54.3M359M15%
EBITDA-2.04M-3.43M59%
Gain YTD2.62031.4528%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.36M17.9M8%
Total Debt34KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALVLF vs BYAGF: Fundamental Ratings
ALVLF
BYAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7522
SMR RATING
1..100
9692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYAGF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as ALVLF (85). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew similarly to ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALVLF (75). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ALVLF (96). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew similarly to ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ALVLF (36). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew similarly to ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

ALVLF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYAGF (100). This means that ALVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVLFBYAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALVLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BYAGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGLCF0.360.04
+10.83%
Cassiar Gold Corp.
TLPFY34.521.21
+3.63%
Teleperformance
CCHBF51.60N/A
N/A
COCA COLA HBC LTD
RYBIF19.04N/A
N/A
Ryobi Ltd.
MAJI0.06-0.01
-7.76%
Marijuana Inc.

ALVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALVLF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALVLF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALVLF
1D Price
Change %
ALVLF100%
-2.44%
BYAGF - ALVLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
AMXEF - ALVLF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
ARBTF - ALVLF
6%
Poorly correlated
+19.09%
APRAF - ALVLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+7.71%
AUGO - ALVLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
More

BYAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYAGF and GFI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYAGF and GFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAGF
1D Price
Change %
BYAGF100%
+1.61%
GFI - BYAGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
IAUX - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
BTG - BYAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
OR - BYAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
ORZCF - BYAGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
More