ALVLF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
14.6M
BYAGF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
69.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALVLF vs BYAGF

Header iconALVLF vs BYAGF Comparison
Open Charts ALVLF vs BYAGFBanner chart's image
Big Ridge Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$221.29K
Capitalization14.6M
Banyan Gold
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$572.03K
Capitalization69.84M
ALVLF vs BYAGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALVLF vs. BYAGF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALVLF is a Hold and BYAGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ALVLF: $0.07 vs. BYAGF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: ALVLF and BYAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALVLF: 271% vs. BYAGF: 154%
Market capitalization -- ALVLF: $14.6M vs. BYAGF: $69.84M
ALVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $14.6M. BYAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $69.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBYAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BYAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ALVLF and BYAGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYAGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BYAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ALVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +41.16% price change this week, while BYAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYAGF($69.8M) has a higher market cap than ALVLF($14.6M). BYAGF YTD gains are higher at: 30.310 vs. ALVLF (-2.239). BYAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.8M vs. ALVLF (-3.42M). BYAGF has more cash in the bank: 6.21M vs. ALVLF (1.09M). ALVLF (0) and BYAGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ALVLFBYAGFALVLF / BYAGF
Capitalization14.6M69.8M21%
EBITDA-3.42M-2.8M122%
Gain YTD-2.23930.310-7%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.09M6.21M18%
Total Debt45.4KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALVLF vs BYAGF: Fundamental Ratings
ALVLF
BYAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
354
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYAGF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALVLF (84). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALVLF (100). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as ALVLF (97). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew similarly to ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

ALVLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BYAGF (62). This means that ALVLF’s stock grew similarly to BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

ALVLF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYAGF (100). This means that ALVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

ALVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALVLF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALVLF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALVLF
1D Price
Change %
ALVLF100%
+7.73%
BYAGF - ALVLF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
LECRF - ALVLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
KDKCF - ALVLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
PGLDF - ALVLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
NSGCF - ALVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BYAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYAGF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BYAGF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAGF
1D Price
Change %
BYAGF100%
-0.02%
VITFF - BYAGF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMDRF - BYAGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALVLF - BYAGF
33%
Poorly correlated
+7.73%
FSXLF - BYAGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
NSUPF - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
More