ALVLF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
23.37M
AMXEF
Price
$1.60
Change
+$0.12 (+8.11%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
197.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALVLF vs AMXEF

Header iconALVLF vs AMXEF Comparison
Open Charts ALVLF vs AMXEFBanner chart's image
Big Ridge Gold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$242.95K
Capitalization23.37M
Amex Exploration
Price$1.60
Change+$0.12 (+8.11%)
Volume$16.75K
Capitalization197.59M
ALVLF vs AMXEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AMXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALVLF vs. AMXEF commentary
Aug 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALVLF is a Hold and AMXEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ALVLF: $0.10 vs. AMXEF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: ALVLF and AMXEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALVLF: 91% vs. AMXEF: 28%
Market capitalization -- ALVLF: $23.37M vs. AMXEF: $197.59M
ALVLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $23.37M. AMXEF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $197.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $79.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAMXEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • AMXEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALVLF is a better buy in the long-term than AMXEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALVLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMXEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALVLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • AMXEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ALVLF and AMXEF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ALVLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.09% price change this week, while AMXEF (@Precious Metals) price change was +17.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5266.44%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.41% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMXEF($198M) has a higher market cap than ALVLF($23.4M). AMXEF YTD gains are higher at: 106.986 vs. ALVLF (53.672). ALVLF (-3.31M) and AMXEF (-3.43M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . AMXEF has more cash in the bank: 10.2M vs. ALVLF (336K). ALVLF (0) and AMXEF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ALVLFAMXEFALVLF / AMXEF
Capitalization23.4M198M12%
EBITDA-3.31M-3.43M97%
Gain YTD53.672106.98650%
P/E RatioN/A115.31-
Revenue00-
Total Cash336K10.2M3%
Total Debt34KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALVLF vs AMXEF: Fundamental Ratings
ALVLF
AMXEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
9791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALVLF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as AMXEF (89). This means that ALVLF’s stock grew similarly to AMXEF’s over the last 12 months.

ALVLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as AMXEF (100). This means that ALVLF’s stock grew similarly to AMXEF’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as ALVLF (97). This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ALVLF (36). This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to ALVLF’s over the last 12 months.

ALVLF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMXEF (96). This means that ALVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMXEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVLFAMXEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AMXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCEKF0.12N/A
+2.66%
Bear Creek Mining Corp.
ANMP0.40N/A
N/A
Anacomp, Inc.
VRBCF346.00N/A
N/A
Virbac SA
BOIVF5.68-0.05
-0.79%
Bollore Investissement
KSIOF4.06-0.06
-1.48%
kneat.com, Inc.

ALVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALVLF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALVLF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALVLF
1D Price
Change %
ALVLF100%
-1.10%
BYAGF - ALVLF
33%
Poorly correlated
+15.91%
NSGCF - ALVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSUPF - ALVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CBGZF - ALVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
AMXEF - ALVLF
14%
Poorly correlated
+7.82%
More

AMXEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMXEF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMXEF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMXEF
1D Price
Change %
AMXEF100%
+7.82%
BYAGF - AMXEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+15.91%
CGLCF - AMXEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
ALVLF - AMXEF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
ARBTF - AMXEF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANKOF - AMXEF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+5.95%
More