ALV
Price
$124.69
Change
-$0.74 (-0.59%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.58B
41 days until earnings call
VC
Price
$125.23
Change
-$0.17 (-0.14%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.41B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs VC

Header iconALV vs VC Comparison
Open Charts ALV vs VCBanner chart's image
Autoliv
Price$124.69
Change-$0.74 (-0.59%)
Volume$491.5K
Capitalization9.58B
Visteon
Price$125.23
Change-$0.17 (-0.14%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization3.41B
ALV vs VC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. VC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Buy and VC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ALV: $124.69 vs. VC: $125.13)
Brand notoriety: ALV and VC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 69% vs. VC: 52%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9.58B vs. VC: $3.41B
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.58B. VC’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than VC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the short-term than VC.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.19% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

VC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.40% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALV($9.58B) has a higher market cap than VC($3.41B). ALV has higher P/E ratio than VC: ALV (13.67) vs VC (11.92). VC YTD gains are higher at: 41.666 vs. ALV (35.755). VC has less debt than ALV: VC (442M) vs ALV (2.22B).
ALVVCALV / VC
Capitalization9.58B3.41B281%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.75541.66686%
P/E Ratio13.6711.92115%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.22B442M501%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs VC: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
VC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2364
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3668
SMR RATING
1..100
3341
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
468
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALV's Valuation (30) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VC (63). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than VC’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as VC (68). This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (33) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as VC (41). This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.

VC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as ALV (43). This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

VC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALV (46). This means that VC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBXG14.750.05
+0.34%
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund
FDWM25.270.02
+0.09%
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF
PSMO29.82N/A
-0.01%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF
GDEC36.18-0.08
-0.22%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Dec
HOOG60.57-1.89
-3.03%
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

ALV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALV
1D Price
Change %
ALV100%
+0.09%
BWA - ALV
74%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
ADNT - ALV
73%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
LEA - ALV
71%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
VC - ALV
70%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
MGA - ALV
69%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
More

VC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VC has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VC jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VC
1D Price
Change %
VC100%
+2.19%
ADNT - VC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
LEA - VC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
MGA - VC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
BWA - VC
73%
Closely correlated
+2.00%
ALV - VC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More