ALV
Price
$124.92
Change
+$1.73 (+1.40%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.46B
21 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$46.56
Change
+$0.53 (+1.15%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.22B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs MGA

Header iconALV vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts ALV vs MGABanner chart's image
Autoliv
Price$124.92
Change+$1.73 (+1.40%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.46B
Magna International
Price$46.56
Change+$0.53 (+1.15%)
Volume$1.18M
Capitalization13.22B
ALV vs MGA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. MGA commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Buy and MGA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ALV: $123.20 vs. MGA: $46.56)
Brand notoriety: ALV and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 120% vs. MGA: 81%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9.46B vs. MGA: $13.22B
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.46B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $13.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than MGA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the short-term than MGA.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.73% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.59% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($13.2B) has a higher market cap than ALV($9.46B). ALV has higher P/E ratio than MGA: ALV (13.51) vs MGA (10.93). ALV YTD gains are higher at: 34.133 vs. MGA (15.716). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.04B vs. ALV (1.47B). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. ALV (237M). ALV has less debt than MGA: ALV (2.22B) vs MGA (8.12B). MGA has higher revenues than ALV: MGA (41.6B) vs ALV (10.5B).
ALVMGAALV / MGA
Capitalization9.46B13.2B72%
EBITDA1.47B4.04B36%
Gain YTD34.13315.716217%
P/E Ratio13.5110.93124%
Revenue10.5B41.6B25%
Total Cash237M1.54B15%
Total Debt2.22B8.12B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6963
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4293
SMR RATING
1..100
3270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3463
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (13) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as ALV (30). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGA (93). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (32) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGA (70). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGA (45). This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGA (63). This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LQAI40.27N/A
N/A
LG QRAFT AI-Powrd U.S. Lg Cp Cor ETF
BJAN52.62-0.13
-0.26%
Innovator US Equity Buff ETF™ Jan
PRAY31.04-0.16
-0.51%
FIS Christian Stock ETF
DRSK28.90-0.19
-0.65%
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
ORCX42.88-5.33
-11.06%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF

ALV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALV
1D Price
Change %
ALV100%
-1.33%
BWA - ALV
74%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
ADNT - ALV
73%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
VC - ALV
70%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
LEA - ALV
70%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
MGA - ALV
68%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
+1.19%
LEA - MGA
78%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
ADNT - MGA
75%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
VC - MGA
75%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
ALV - MGA
72%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
BWA - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
More