ALV
Price
$119.78
Change
+$1.89 (+1.60%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.1B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CTTAY
Price
$7.82
Change
+$0.16 (+2.09%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.21B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs CTTAY

Header iconALV vs CTTAY Comparison
Open Charts ALV vs CTTAYBanner chart's image
Autoliv
Price$119.78
Change+$1.89 (+1.60%)
Volume$607.52K
Capitalization9.1B
Continental AG
Price$7.82
Change+$0.16 (+2.09%)
Volume$18.46K
Capitalization15.21B
ALV vs CTTAY Comparison Chart in %
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CTTAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. CTTAY commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a StrongBuy and CTTAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ALV: $117.90 vs. CTTAY: $7.61)
Brand notoriety: ALV and CTTAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 19% vs. CTTAY: 72%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9.1B vs. CTTAY: $15.21B
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.1B. CTTAY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $15.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCTTAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CTTAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTTAY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CTTAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTTAY is a better buy in the short-term than ALV.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

CTTAY is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.85% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAY($15.2B) has a higher market cap than ALV($9.1B). ALV (12.41) and CTTAY (11.87) have similar P/E ratio . CTTAY YTD gains are higher at: 56.406 vs. ALV (28.363). CTTAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.38B vs. ALV (1.47B). CTTAY has higher revenues than ALV: CTTAY (39.6B) vs ALV (10.5B).
ALVCTTAYALV / CTTAY
Capitalization9.1B15.2B60%
EBITDA1.47B4.38B34%
Gain YTD28.36356.40650%
P/E Ratio12.4111.87105%
Revenue10.5B39.6B27%
Total Cash237MN/A-
Total Debt2.22BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs CTTAY: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
CTTAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4482
SMR RATING
1..100
3253
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4769
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALV's Valuation (25) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAY (68) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAY (82) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (32) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAY (53) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ALV (50) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAY (69) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVCTTAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CTTAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTCO90.845.56
+6.52%
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
XTOC33.170.10
+0.31%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF™ Oct
DIVO45.14-0.01
-0.02%
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
GSEE56.54-0.21
-0.38%
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF
SMCX15.62-0.48
-2.98%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF

ALV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALV
1D Price
Change %
ALV100%
-0.57%
BWA - ALV
75%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
APTV - ALV
72%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
VC - ALV
71%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
MGA - ALV
70%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
LEA - ALV
69%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
More

CTTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAY
1D Price
Change %
CTTAY100%
N/A
VLEEY - CTTAY
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTTAF - CTTAY
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MGDDY - CTTAY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALV - CTTAY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
LEA - CTTAY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
More