ALV
Price
$128.23
Change
-$0.22 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:09 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.76B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CTTAY
Price
$7.96
Change
+$0.06 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
15.76B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs CTTAY

Header iconALV vs CTTAY Comparison
Open Charts ALV vs CTTAYBanner chart's image
Autoliv
Price$128.23
Change-$0.22 (-0.17%)
Volume$200
Capitalization9.76B
Continental AG
Price$7.96
Change+$0.06 (+0.76%)
Volume$14.67K
Capitalization15.76B
ALV vs CTTAY Comparison Chart in %
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CTTAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. CTTAY commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Hold and CTTAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (ALV: $128.45 vs. CTTAY: $7.96)
Brand notoriety: ALV and CTTAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 137% vs. CTTAY: 55%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9.76B vs. CTTAY: $15.76B
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.76B. CTTAY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $15.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $80.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCTTAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CTTAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTTAY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CTTAY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the short-term than CTTAY.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.22% price change this week, while CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

CTTAY is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.49% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAY($15.8B) has a higher market cap than ALV($9.76B). ALV has higher P/E ratio than CTTAY: ALV (13.31) vs CTTAY (11.87). ALV YTD gains are higher at: 8.214 vs. CTTAY (-0.500). CTTAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.47B vs. ALV (1.52B). CTTAY has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. ALV (225M). ALV has less debt than CTTAY: ALV (2.19B) vs CTTAY (7.59B). CTTAY has higher revenues than ALV: CTTAY (39.5B) vs ALV (10.6B).
ALVCTTAYALV / CTTAY
Capitalization9.76B15.8B62%
EBITDA1.52B3.47B44%
Gain YTD8.214-0.500-1,643%
P/E Ratio13.3111.87112%
Revenue10.6B39.5B27%
Total Cash225M1.44B16%
Total Debt2.19B7.59B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs CTTAY: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
CTTAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2118
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
3088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4778
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALV's Valuation (28) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAY (77) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAY (100) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (30) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAY (88) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ALV (46) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAY (78) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVCTTAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CTTAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INCE63.390.44
+0.70%
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
SH35.660.18
+0.51%
ProShares Short S&P500
SRET22.490.11
+0.47%
Global X SuperDividend® REIT ETF
BLCN24.92-0.02
-0.08%
Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
XAIX43.23-0.48
-1.10%
Xtrackers Artfcl Intlgc and Big Dt ETF

ALV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALV
1D Price
Change %
ALV100%
+0.22%
BWA - ALV
74%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
VC - ALV
71%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
MGA - ALV
70%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
APTV - ALV
70%
Closely correlated
-6.03%
LEA - ALV
69%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
More

CTTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAY
1D Price
Change %
CTTAY100%
+0.76%
VLEEY - CTTAY
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
CTTAF - CTTAY
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
MGDDY - CTTAY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALV - CTTAY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
LEA - CTTAY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More