ALSSF
Price
$2.48
Change
-$0.24 (-8.82%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.17B
SSPPF
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.07 (+3.37%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.91B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSSF vs SSPPF

Header iconALSSF vs SSPPF Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs SSPPFBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$2.48
Change-$0.24 (-8.82%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.17B
SSP Group
Price$2.15
Change+$0.07 (+3.37%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization1.91B
ALSSF vs SSPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. SSPPF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a Hold and SSPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $2.48 vs. SSPPF: $2.15)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and SSPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 41% vs. SSPPF: 108%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $2.17B vs. SSPPF: $1.91B
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.17B. SSPPF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSSPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SSPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than SSPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSPPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALSSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SSPPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSPPF is a better buy in the short-term than ALSSF.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SSPPF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSSF($2.17B) has a higher market cap than SSPPF($1.91B). ALSSF has higher P/E ratio than SSPPF: ALSSF (65.20) vs SSPPF (46.06). ALSSF YTD gains are higher at: 19.231 vs. SSPPF (-15.686). ALSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.3B vs. SSPPF (588M). ALSSF has more cash in the bank: 4.08B vs. SSPPF (207M). SSPPF has less debt than ALSSF: SSPPF (2.11B) vs ALSSF (52.6B). ALSSF has higher revenues than SSPPF: ALSSF (80.8B) vs SSPPF (3.58B).
ALSSFSSPPFALSSF / SSPPF
Capitalization2.17B1.91B114%
EBITDA15.3B588M2,602%
Gain YTD19.231-15.686-123%
P/E Ratio65.2046.06142%
Revenue80.8B3.58B2,259%
Total Cash4.08B207M1,969%
Total Debt52.6B2.11B2,488%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF vs SSPPF: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
SSPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
7697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5175
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
399
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALSSF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSPPF (90). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew significantly faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

ALSSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSPPF (100). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

ALSSF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as SSPPF (97). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew similarly to SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

ALSSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SSPPF (75). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew similarly to SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

ALSSF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSPPF (99). This means that ALSSF’s stock grew significantly faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSSFSSPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLVCX42.160.45
+1.08%
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock
TINRX43.940.21
+0.48%
Nuveen Equity Index A
IRSEX15.180.07
+0.46%
Macquarie Real Estate Securities R6
FCEUX17.900.07
+0.39%
Franklin U.S. Core Equity Advisor
IPSSX20.270.06
+0.30%
Voya Index Plus SmallCap Port S

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and SSPPF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and SSPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
N/A
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFCGF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+7.04%
More

SSPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSPPF and FWRG have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSPPF and FWRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSPPF
1D Price
Change %
SSPPF100%
N/A
FWRG - SSPPF
15%
Poorly correlated
+7.04%
BROS - SSPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
ALSSF - SSPPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - SSPPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GAMN - SSPPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More