ALSSF
Price
$3.24
Change
-$0.13 (-3.86%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FWRG
Price
$17.24
Change
+$0.39 (+2.31%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.03B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSSF vs FWRG

Header iconALSSF vs FWRG Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs FWRGBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$3.24
Change-$0.13 (-3.86%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization2.45B
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$17.24
Change+$0.39 (+2.31%)
Volume$38.89K
Capitalization1.03B
ALSSF vs FWRG Comparison Chart in %
ALSSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FWRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. FWRG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a Hold and FWRG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $3.07 vs. FWRG: $16.85)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and FWRG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 328% vs. FWRG: 271%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $2.45B vs. FWRG: $1.03B
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.45B. FWRG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $227.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFWRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than FWRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWRG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALSSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FWRG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FWRG is a better buy in the short-term than ALSSF.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.46% price change this week, while FWRG (@Restaurants) price change was +5.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.67% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSSF($2.45B) has a higher market cap than FWRG($1.03B). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than ALSSF: FWRG (210.63) vs ALSSF (69.78). FWRG YTD gains are higher at: 11.737 vs. ALSSF (9.545). ALSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.15B vs. FWRG (93.7M). ALSSF has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. FWRG (20.7M). FWRG has less debt than ALSSF: FWRG (982M) vs ALSSF (51.8B). ALSSF has higher revenues than FWRG: ALSSF (83.8B) vs FWRG (1.17B).
ALSSFFWRGALSSF / FWRG
Capitalization2.45B1.03B238%
EBITDA8.15B93.7M8,697%
Gain YTD9.54511.73781%
P/E Ratio69.78210.6333%
Revenue83.8B1.17B7,169%
Total Cash4.66B20.7M22,498%
Total Debt51.8B982M5,275%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
92
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSSFFWRG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALSSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FWRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VENAX72.662.18
+3.09%
Vanguard Energy Index Admiral
EQNAX23.200.08
+0.35%
MFS Equity Income A
MXVHX7.18N/A
N/A
Empower Large Cap Value Instl
FSEPX15.42N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq M
SJGAX31.30N/A
N/A
Steward Large Cap Growth A

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and FWRG have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and FWRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.53%
BROS - ALSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFCGF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
+4.53%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-10.60%
CAKE - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
BJRI - FWRG
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
WEN - FWRG
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
KRUS - FWRG
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
More