ALSSF
Price
$2.96
Change
+$0.06 (+2.07%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
CFCGF
Price
$0.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSSF vs CFCGF

Header iconALSSF vs CFCGF Comparison
Open Charts ALSSF vs CFCGFBanner chart's image
Alsea SA
Price$2.96
Change+$0.06 (+2.07%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization2.37B
Cafe de Coral Holdings
Price$0.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.64K
CapitalizationN/A
ALSSF vs CFCGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSSF vs. CFCGF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSSF is a Hold and CFCGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSSF: $2.96 vs. CFCGF: $0.88)
Brand notoriety: ALSSF and CFCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSSF: 3% vs. CFCGF: 211%
Market capitalization -- ALSSF: $2.37B vs. CFCGF: $0
ALSSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.37B. CFCGF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCFCGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CFCGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSSF is a better buy in the long-term than CFCGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFCGF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALSSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CFCGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFCGF is a better buy in the short-term than ALSSF.

Price Growth

ALSSF (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while CFCGF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSSF has higher P/E ratio than CFCGF: ALSSF (76.92) vs CFCGF (17.20). ALSSF YTD gains are higher at: 42.308 vs. CFCGF (-14.613). ALSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.3B vs. CFCGF (425M). ALSSF has more cash in the bank: 4.08B vs. CFCGF (1.07B). CFCGF has less debt than ALSSF: CFCGF (2.33B) vs ALSSF (52.6B). ALSSF has higher revenues than CFCGF: ALSSF (80.8B) vs CFCGF (8.64B).
ALSSFCFCGFALSSF / CFCGF
Capitalization2.37BN/A-
EBITDA15.3B425M3,600%
Gain YTD42.308-14.613-290%
P/E Ratio76.9217.20447%
Revenue80.8B8.64B935%
Total Cash4.08B1.07B380%
Total Debt52.6B2.33B2,256%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSSF: Fundamental Ratings
ALSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSSFCFCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGCKX45.75N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth Company K
CVFYX16.67N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Disciplined Value Y
CIPIX24.58N/A
N/A
Champlain Mid Cap Institutional
LYRIX29.96N/A
N/A
Lyrical US Value Equity Institutional
AMAKX10.59N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Dividend R6

ALSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSSF and SSPPF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSSF and SSPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSSF
1D Price
Change %
ALSSF100%
+2.07%
SSPPF - ALSSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFCGF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - ALSSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - ALSSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More

CFCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFCGF and PTLO have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFCGF and PTLO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFCGF
1D Price
Change %
CFCGF100%
N/A
PTLO - CFCGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
FWRG - CFCGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
VSTD - CFCGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.69%
BTBD - CFCGF
0%
Poorly correlated
-19.86%
GAMN - CFCGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More