Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALSAX vs WCMLX
ALSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ALSAX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Growth A
Price$11.47
Change+$0.16 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.3M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
ALSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSAX has more cash in the bank: 199M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). ALSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ALSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ALSAX (29 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ALSAX (1.34). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ALSAX (49.68). ALSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ALSAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). ALSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.44 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. ALSAX (-20.64).
| ALSAX | WCMLX | ALSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.99 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.79 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.397 | 7.621 | 110% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 199M | 44.4M | 448% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | -1.14 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.97 | 21.83 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.64 | 1.99 | -1,038% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement