ALSAF
Price
$7.00
Change
-$3.04 (-30.28%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
139M
HSPO
Price
$12.01
Change
+$0.03 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
94.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSAF vs HSPO

Header iconALSAF vs HSPO Comparison
Open Charts ALSAF vs HSPOBanner chart's image
Alpha Star Acquisition
Price$7.00
Change-$3.04 (-30.28%)
Volume$286
Capitalization139M
Horizon Space Acquisition I
Price$12.01
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
Volume$226
Capitalization94.09M
ALSAF vs HSPO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSAF vs. HSPO commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSAF is a Hold and HSPO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSAF: $7.00 vs. HSPO: $12.01)
Brand notoriety: ALSAF and HSPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSAF: 96% vs. HSPO: 4%
Market capitalization -- ALSAF: $139M vs. HSPO: $94.09M
ALSAF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $139M. HSPO’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $94.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHSPO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HSPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSPO is a better buy in the long-term than ALSAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSPO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALSAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HSPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HSPO is a better buy in the short-term than ALSAF.

Price Growth

ALSAF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HSPO (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.67% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSAF($139M) has a higher market cap than HSPO($94.1M). HSPO YTD gains are higher at: 3.624 vs. ALSAF (-30.000). HSPO has less debt than ALSAF: HSPO (70K) vs ALSAF (4.85M).
ALSAFHSPOALSAF / HSPO
Capitalization139M94.1M148%
EBITDA-432.02KN/A-
Gain YTD-30.0003.624-828%
P/E Ratio21.79N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total CashN/A289K-
Total Debt4.85M70K6,929%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSAFHSPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
3%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
9%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
14%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AACAY5.280.27
+5.47%
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc
RSNVF0.09N/A
+0.31%
Reyna Silver Corp.
FCCTP12.06N/A
N/A
First Community Corp. (TN)
PSGFF0.19N/A
N/A
Precious Shipping Plc
XROLF110.78-3.18
-2.79%
Xero Ltd.

ALSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ALSAF and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALSAF and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSAF
1D Price
Change %
ALSAF100%
N/A
PLMIU - ALSAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FORLU - ALSAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPO - ALSAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
RTGC - ALSAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIAF - ALSAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More